ArticlePloS one2022
Direct assessment of possible mutations in the 23S rRNA gene encoding macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extra Virgin Olive Oil-Based Formulations: A "Green" Strategy againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Chlamydial and Gonococcal Genital Infections: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reports of potential treatment failure have raised particular concerns regarding the efficacy of the single dose azithromycin regimen in the treatment of urogenital and anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections. Several factors have been suggested, including heterotypic resistance. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in CT requires cell culture with serial dilutions of antibiotics, which is laborious and for which there is no standardized testing methodology. One method to partly overcome these difficulties would be to use a genotypic resistance assay, however most current available assays do still require prior CT culture. In order to facilitate the assessment of genotypic resistance directly from clinical samples, without the need for prior culture, the aim of this study was to develop a CT specific PCR assay for the assessment of resistance associated mutations (RAMs) in the 23S rRNA gene, and to evaluate a sample of clinical cases in which CT PCR's remained positive during follow-up despite azithromycin treatment. Neither the in silico analysis nor the analytical specificity testing demonstrated clinically relevant cross-reactivity with other bacterial species. These results in conjunction with the analytical sensitivity demonstrating consistent CT 23S rRNA gene detection in the range of 10e3 IFU/mL, exemplify the assay's apt performance. Although no known macrolide RAMs were detected in the clinical cases, the described assay allows future culture independent macrolide RAM surveillance in CT, and increases accessibility for other laboratories to engage in screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.