Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536721›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma.

Brandon G Gerberich, Bailey G Hannon, Dillon M Brown, A Thomas Read, Matthew D Ritch, Elisa Schrader Echeverri, Lauren Nichols, Cahil Potnis, Sreesh Sridhar, Maya G Toothman and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomechanical Modification of the Sclera: An Ex Vivo Study on Porcine Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Comprehensive Protocol for Microbead-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon G GerberichWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bailey G HannonGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dillon M BrownWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
A Thomas ReadWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Matthew D RitchWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elisa Schrader EcheverriWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lauren NicholsSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cahil PotnisCenter for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sreesh SridharWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maya G ToothmanCollege of Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen A SchwanerGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Erin J WingerSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hannah HuangWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gabby S GershonWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew J FeolaWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Machelle T PardueWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark R PrausnitzWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C Ross EthierWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · USAtlanta VA Health Care System · US

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NICKERSON, JOHN M · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
VIsion Science Training in AtlantaT32EY007092 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Machelle T. Pardue · 1985 to 2026
$4.6M
Targeting Scleral Stiffness as a Novel Therapeutic Approach in GlaucomaR01EY025286 · NEI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ETHIER, C ROSS · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
RR&D Research Career Scientist Award ApplicationIK6RX003134 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI PARDUE, MACHELLE T. · 2019 to 2025
–
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025286NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007092RRD VA IK2 RX002342RRD VA IK6 RX003134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Scleral stiffening may protect against glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss or dysfunction associated with ocular hypertension. Here, we assess the potential neuroprotective effects of two treatments designed to stiffen either the entire posterior sclera or only the sclera adjacent to the peripapillary sclera in an experimental model of glaucoma. Methods: Rat sclerae were stiffened in vivo using either genipin (crosslinking the entire posterior sclera) or a regionally selective photosensitizer, methylene blue (stiffening only the juxtaperipapillary region surrounding the optic nerve). Ocular hypertension was induced using magnetic microbeads delivered to the anterior chamber. Morphological and functional outcomes, including optic nerve axon count and appearance, retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography, optomotor response, and electroretinography traces, were assessed. Results: Both local (juxtaperipapillary) and global (whole posterior) scleral stiffening treatments were successful at increasing scleral stiffness, but neither provided demonstrable neuroprotection in hypertensive eyes as assessed by RGC axon counts and appearance, optomotor response, or electroretinography. There was a weak indication that scleral crosslinking protected against retinal thinning as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Conclusions: Scleral stiffening was not demonstrated to be neuroprotective in ocular hypertensive rats. We hypothesize that the absence of benefit may in part be due to RGC loss associated with the scleral stiffening agents themselves (mild in the case of genipin, and moderate in the case of methylene blue), negating any potential benefit of scleral stiffening. Translational Relevance: The development of scleral stiffening as a neuroprotective treatment will require the identification of better tolerated stiffening protocols and further preclinical testing.

Indexed as

GlaucomaScleraAnimalsIntraocular PressureMethylene BlueNeuroprotectionRatsMethylene Blue

Identifiers

PMID35536721
PMCPMC9100482
OpenAlexW4280493055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.