ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Robot-Assisted Orbital Fat Decompression Surgery: First in Human.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of various orbital decompression techniques in treating thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-Assisted Eye Surgery: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Safety, and Practicality in Clinical Settings.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Pooled it
- Recent advances: Augmented reality, robotics, and navigation in oculoplasty and orbit.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Management of Thyroid Eye Disease: A Comparison Between Three Recent Clinical Guidelines.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Advancements in robotic surgery for vitreoretinal diseases: current trends and the future.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Use of Robotic Surgery for the Management of Orbital Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a surgical robot system for orbital decompression surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Prediction of exophthalmos by body mass index for craniofacial reconstruction: consequences for cold cases.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Robotic assisted orbital surgery for resection of advanced periocular tumours - a case series report on the feasibility, safety and outcome.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- 360 Degrees Endoscopic Access to and Through the Orbit.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Surgery: Current Applications and Expectations.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Orbital and eyelid diseases: The next breakthrough in artificial intelligence?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Oculoplastic publication trends in general ophthalmology journals.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in oculoplastics: Novel applications and future prospects.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted orbital fat decompression surgery. Methods: Ten prospectively enrolled patients (18 eyes) with Graves' ophthalmopathy underwent robot-assisted orbital fat decompression surgery with the da Vinci Xi surgical system. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and complications were recorded. For every patient, the exophthalmos of the operated eyes and Graves' orbitopathy quality of life (GO-QoL) were measured both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively to assess the surgical effect. Results: All surgical procedures were successfully performed. The mean duration to complete the whole procedure was 124.3 ± 33.2 minutes (range, 60-188). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 17.8 ± 6.2 mL (range, 7.5-28). There were neither complications nor unexpected events in terms of either orbital decompression surgery or robot-assisted procedures. The mean exophthalmos was 20.2 ± 1.8 mm before surgery and 17.9 ± 1.4 mm postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The preoperative and postoperative GO-QoL on the visual function arm was 84.38 ± 20.04 and 93.75 ± 9.32, respectively. The preoperative and postoperative GO-QoL on the appearance arm was 42.50 ± 14.97 and 64.38 ± 21.46, respectively (P = 0.027). Conclusions: The da Vinci Xi surgical system provided the stability, dexterity, and good visualization necessary for orbital fat decompression surgery, indicating the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted orbital fat decompression surgery. Translational Relevance: Based on a literature search using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, we believe that this study reports the first in-human results of the safety and effectiveness of da Vinci robot-assisted orbital fat decompression surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.