Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536580›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112).

Soudabeh Fazeli, Bradley S Snyder, Ilana F Gareen, Constance D Lehman, Seema A Khan, Justin Romanoff, Constantine A Gatsonis, Ralph L Corsetti, Habib Rahbar, Derrick W Spell and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Soudabeh FazeliDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego.
Bradley S SnyderCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ilana F GareenCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Constance D LehmanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Seema A KhanDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Justin RomanoffCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Constantine A GatsonisCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ralph L CorsettiDepartment of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Habib RahbarDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Derrick W SpellGulf South NCORP, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Kenneth B BlanksteinHunterdon Regional Cancer Center, Flemington, New Jersey.
Linda K HanDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Jennifer L SabolDepartment of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania.
John R BumberryDepartment of Surgery, Mercy Hospital Springfield, Springfield, Missouri.
Kathy D MillerIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis.
Joseph A SparanoDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Christopher E ComstockDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lynne I WagnerWake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Ruth C CarlosDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Brown University · USGulf South Research Corporation · USHarvard University · USIndiana University Health · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USLankenau Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMercy Hospital Springfield · USMount Sinai Health System · USNorthwestern University · USRegional Cancer Center · USTulane University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Washington · USWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Guiding treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires understanding patient preferences and the influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgeon recommendation. Objective: To identify factors associated with surgery preference and surgery receipt among a prospective cohort of women with newly diagnosed DCIS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted at 75 participating institutions, including community practices and academic centers, across the US between March 25, 2015, and April 27, 2016. Data were analyzed from August 2 to September 24, 2021. This was an ancillary study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). Women with recently diagnosed unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 months of study registration were included. Participants who had documented surgery and completed the baseline patient-reported outcome questionnaires were included in this substudy. Exposures: Women received preoperative MRI and surgeon consultation and then underwent wide local excision or mastectomy. Participants will be followed up for recurrence and overall survival for 10 years from the date of surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessed treatment goals and concerns and surgery preference before MRI and after MRI and surgeon consultation. Results: Of the 368 participants enrolled 316 (86%) were included in this substudy (median [range] age, 59.5 [34-87] years; 45 women [14%] were Black; 245 [78%] were White; and 26 [8%] were of other race). Pre-MRI, age (odds ratio [OR] per 5-year increment, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80; P = .007) and the importance of keeping one's breast (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72; P < .001) vs removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.76; P = .03) were associated with surgery preference for mastectomy. After MRI and surgeon consultation, MRI upstaging (48 of 316 [15%]) was associated with patient preference for mastectomy (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 2.51-26.06; P < .001). The 2 variables with the highest ORs for initial receipt of mastectomy were MRI upstaging (OR, 12.08; 95% CI, 4.34-33.61; P < .001) and surgeon recommendation (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.99-11.83; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, change in patient preference for DCIS surgery and surgery received were responsive to MRI results and surgeon recommendation. These data highlight the importance of ensuring adequate information and ongoing communication about the clinical significance of MRI findings and the benefits and risks of available treatment options.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMastectomyMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35536580
PMCPMC9092204
OpenAlexW4229457615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.