ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2022
3D Bioprinting of Human Hollow Organs.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanobiology rules immune cells' functions: from differentiation to cell trafficking and pathogen killing.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- Biomedical Materials and Fabrication Methods for Construction of In Vitro Neurovascular Unit Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Accessible Biofabrication of Anatomically Inspired Hollow and Branched Hydrogel Constructs by Soft Templating (Sof-T).Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Perspective in 3D mesenchymal stromal cells as tools for potential diabetes treatment.Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Bioprinting in Tissue Repair and Its ENT Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Towards a bioengineered airway: advances in tracheal tissue engineering and biofabrication.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Regenerative Dentistry: Applications of Bioactive Materials in Dentin-Pulp Complex.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for medical application: opportunities and challenges.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- 3D Printing of Enzymatically Softening Hydrogel Biomaterials.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Bioprinting revolution: Innovative design of 3D bioactive scaffolds for living organs and transdermal tissues.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Organ-Specific Strategies in Bioprinting: Addressing Translational Challenges in the Heart, Liver, Kidney, and Pancreas.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- A mathematical phase field model predicts superparamagnetic nanoparticle accelerated fusion of HeLa spheroids for field guided biofabrication.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Numerical Analysis of the Cell Droplet Loading Process in Cell Printing.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Advances in Regenerative Dentistry Approaches: An Update.International dental journal · 2024Review
- Laser-Induced Forward Transfer (LIFT) based Bioprinting of the Collagen I with Retina Photoreceptor Cells.Manufacturing letters · 2023Article
- The Progress in Bioprinting and Its Potential Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- AFM Analysis of a Three-Point Flexure Tested, 3D Printing Definitive Restoration Material for Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Tissue Engineering for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Tracts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D bioprinting is a rapidly evolving technique that has been found to have extensive applications in disease research, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. 3D bioprinting might be a solution to global organ shortages and the growing aversion to testing cell patterning for novel tissue fabrication and building superior disease models. It has the unrivaled capability of layer-by-layer deposition using different types of biomaterials, stem cells, and biomolecules with a perfectly regulated spatial distribution. The tissue regeneration of hollow organs has always been a challenge for medical science because of the complexities of their cell structures. In this mini review, we will address the status of the science behind tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting of epithelialized tubular hollow organs. This review will also cover the current challenges and prospects, as well as the application of these complicated 3D-printed organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.