ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022
Foreign body removal with the assistance of ultrasound guidance and methylene blue staining in children-a cohort study.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Removal of Mini-Sling Anchor With Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Site Marking With Methylene Blue.O&G open · 2026Article
- What Lies Beneath? Using Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) to Identify Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in Children and Adults: A Literature Review.POCUS journal · 2025Article
- The application of ultrasound-guided cannulated screw removal after proximal tibial fracture surgery: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoft tissue foreign bodies (FBs) are very commonly observed in paediatric emergency departments. Not all FBs can be removed effectively, even via open surgery and image intensifier guidance. In the current study, we evaluated the efficiency of FB removal with the assistance of ultrasound (US) and methylene blue (MB) staining.
methodsWe enrolled 80 patients at our clinical center between May 2016 and December 2020. Eleven patients were operated upon with the assistance of US guidance and MB and were defined as group A; the other 69 patients were defined as group B. For the patients in group A, US was first used to locate the FB; MB was then injected next to the FB. Open surgery was subsequently performed. For group B, the FBs were removed by conventional methods. The surgical outcomes were evaluated according to surgical duration, incision infection rates, radiograph exposure times, and FB residue rates.
resultsThe average surgery time for group A was 0.35 ± 0.10 hours; the corresponding time was 0.49 ± 0.50 hours in group B and there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.032). The radiograph exposure times were 1.33 ± 0.34 in group A and 4.65 ± 1.81 times in group B (p = 0.021).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that assistance of US and MB staining is a more efficient approach compared with traditional methods for FB removal, and this surgical method can be used effectively for FB removal in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.