ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2022
Integrated virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation revealed promising drug candidates of p53-MDM2 interaction.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and interaction mechanism of novel small molecule antagonists targeting CC chemokine receptor 1/3/5 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Pharmacophoric analogs of Savolitinib reveal promising inhibitors of the c-MET receptor tyrosine kinase for drug discovery: in silico investigation.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identification and evaluation of a pinocembrin analog as a TRPV1 inhibitor with analgesic properties in murine pain models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Allosteric activation of AMPK ADaM's site by structural analogs of Epigallocatechin and Galegine: computational molecular modeling investigation.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacophoric analogs of sotorasib-entrapped KRAS G12C in its inactive GDP-bound conformation: covalent docking and molecular dynamics investigations.Molecular diversity · 2023Article
- Docking covalent targets for drug discovery: stimulating the computer-aided drug design community of possible pitfalls and erroneous practices.Molecular diversity · 2023Review
- Identification of EGFR inhibitors as potential agents for cancer therapy: pharmacophore-based modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics investigations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Molecular docking analysis of KRAS inhibitors for cancer management.Bioinformation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the vast majority of malignancies, the p53 tumor suppressor pathway is compromised. In some cancer cells, high levels of MDM2 polyubiquitinate p53 and mark it for destruction, thereby leading to a corresponding downregulation of the protein. MDM2 interacts with p53 via its hydrophobic pocket, and chemical entities that block the dimerization of the protein-protein complex can restore p53 activity. Thus far, only a few chemical compounds have been reported as potent arsenals against p53-MDM2. The Protein Data Bank has crystallogaphic structures of MDM2 in complex with certain compounds. Herein, we have exploited one of the complexes in the identification of new p53-MDM2 antagonists using a hierarchical virtual screening technique. The initial stage was to compile a targeted library of structurally appropriate compounds related to a known effective inhibitor, Nutlin 2, from the PubChem database. The identified 57 compounds were subjected to virtual screening using molecular docking to discover inhibitors with high binding affinity for MDM2. Consequently, five compounds with higher binding affinity than the standard emerged as the most promising therapeutic candidates. When compared to Nutlin 2, four of the drug candidates (CID_140017825, CID_69844501, CID_22721108, and CID_22720965) demonstrated satisfactory pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Finally, MD simulation of the dynamic behavior of lead-protein complexes reveals the stability of the complexes after a 100,000 ps simulation period. In particular, when compared to the other three leads, overall computational modeling found CID_140017825 to be the best pharmacological candidate. Following thorough experimental trials, it may emerge as a promising chemical entity for cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.