Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536354›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Is sequential bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A matched comparative pilot study.

Cécile Batailler, Mike B Anderson, Xavier Flecher, Matthieu Ollivier, Sébastien Parratte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cécile BataillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France. cecile-batailler@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-0906
Mike B AndersonZimmer, GmbH, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Xavier FlecherDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St. Marguerite Hospital, Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Matthieu OllivierDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St. Marguerite Hospital, Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Sébastien ParratteDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Institute of Movement and Locomotion, St. Marguerite Hospital, Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo our knowledge, no papers have reported the results of robotic-assisted surgery for sequential bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Indeed, sequential bilateral TKA present several benefits, as one single anesthesia, surgical episode, hospitalization, and rehabilitation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate peri-operative outcomes and compare the complication rates, clinical outcomes, and implant positioning of sequential bilateral TKA performed with a robotic-assisted system versus a conventional technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients who underwent a sequential bilateral robotic-assisted primary TKA (raTKA) in our institution between November 2019 and February 2021 were included. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 20 sequential bilateral TKA performed with a conventional technique. The two groups were comparable for the demographic data and the preoperative parameters, including preoperative anticoagulation and ASA score. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.

resultsThe operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (< 0.0001), with a mean additional time of 29 min. There was no significant difference between both groups for postoperative blood loss, rate of blood transfusion, or postoperative pain. The average length of stay was 5 days. There was one early complication in the robotic group due to the tibial trackers. The functional outcomes were similar between both groups, except for the functional KSS score, which was better at 6 months in the robotic group (p < 0.0001). The restoration of the knee alignment and the distal femoral anatomy were significantly better in the robotic group than in the conventional group.

conclusionsDespite a longer operative time, the peri-operative parameters of sequential bilateral TKA were similar between robotic and conventional techniques. Further, sequential bilateral raTKA was at least as safe as a conventional technique, without additional risk of medical complications.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansKnee JointPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainBlood lossRobotic-assisted surgeryROSASequential bilateral TKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35536354
OpenAlexW4280497244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.