Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536293›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

How clear is our current view on microbial dark matter? (Re-)assessing public MAG & SAG datasets with MDMcleaner.

John Vollmers, Sandra Wiegand, Florian Lenk, Anne-Kristin Kaster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Increased abundance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in the gut of selectively bred high-tameness mice and its association with behavioural changes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John VollmersInstitute for Biological Interfaces 5 (Institut für Biologische Grenzflächen IBG 5), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-5178
Sandra WiegandInstitute for Biological Interfaces 5 (Institut für Biologische Grenzflächen IBG 5), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Florian LenkInstitute for Biological Interfaces 5 (Institut für Biologische Grenzflächen IBG 5), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Anne-Kristin KasterInstitute for Biological Interfaces 5 (Institut für Biologische Grenzflächen IBG 5), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of today, the majority of environmental microorganisms remain uncultured and is therefore referred to as 'microbial dark matter' (MDM). Hence, genomic insights into these organisms are limited to cultivation-independent approaches such as single-cell- and metagenomics. However, without access to cultured representatives for verifying correct taxon-assignments, MDM genomes may cause potentially misleading conclusions based on misclassified or contaminant contigs, thereby obfuscating our view on the uncultured microbial majority. Moreover, gradual database contaminations by past genome submissions can cause error propagations which affect present as well as future comparative genome analyses. Consequently, strict contamination detection and filtering need to be applied, especially in the case of uncultured MDM genomes. Current genome reporting standards, however, emphasize completeness over purity and the de facto gold standard genome assessment tool, checkM, discriminates against uncultured taxa and fragmented genomes. To tackle these issues, we present a novel contig classification, screening, and filtering workflow and corresponding open-source python implementation called MDMcleaner, which was tested and compared to other tools on mock and real datasets. MDMcleaner revealed substantial contaminations overlooked by current screening approaches and sensitively detects misattributed contigs in both novel genomes and the underlying reference databases, thereby greatly improving our view on 'microbial dark matter'.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyMetagenomicsSoftwareWorkflowContig MappingDatasets as TopicGenomeMetagenomeSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35536293
PMCPMC9303271
OpenAlexW4226404011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.