ArticleCancer research2022
Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the KRAS Relationship between Affinity and Dynamics: A Molecular Simulations Study.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Statistical crystallography reveals an allosteric network in SARS-CoV-2 MCommunications biology · 2026Article
- Computational insights on the molecular interplay between KRas (G12D mutation) and SOS1 modulated by the inhibitor BI-3406.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Defining the Active Conformation of Typical Protein Kinase Domains from Substrate-Bound PDB Structures Enables Active-State AlphaFold2 Models for All 437 Human Catalytic Protein Kinases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SeaMoon: From protein language models to continuous structural heterogeneity.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2025Article
- Time-Resolved Crystallography Reveals the Mechanisms of GTP hydrolysis for N-RAS and the Oncogenic Mutants G12C, G12V and Q61L.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The complex journey of targeting RAS in oncology.BMC cancer · 2025Review
- Orthogonal resistance mechanisms of classical- and induced-proximity inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular principles underlying aggressive cancers.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Development of Receptor Desolvation Scoring and Covalent Sampling in DOCK 6: Methods Evaluated on a RAS Test Set.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Explaining Conformational Diversity in Protein Families through Molecular Motions.Scientific data · 2024Article
- PAK2 is necessary for myelination in the peripheral nervous system.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- GTP-Bound N-Ras Conformational States and Substates Are Modulated by Membrane and Point Mutation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Studying early structural changes in SOS1 mediated KRAS activation mechanism.Current research in structural biology · 2024Article
- Extracellular vesicles from apoptotic BMSCs ameliorate osteoporosis via transporting regenerative signals.Theranostics · 2024Article
- HLA3DB: comprehensive annotation of peptide/HLA complexes enables blind structure prediction of T cell epitopes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Stmol: A component for building interactive molecular visualizations within streamlit web-applications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in RAS isoforms (KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS) are among the most frequent oncogenic alterations in many cancers, making these proteins high priority therapeutic targets. Effectively targeting RAS isoforms requires an exact understanding of their active, inactive, and druggable conformations. However, there is no structural catalog of RAS conformations to guide therapeutic targeting or examining the structural impact of RAS mutations. Here we present an expanded classification of RAS conformations based on analyses of the catalytic switch 1 (SW1) and switch 2 (SW2) loops. From 721 human KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS structures available in the Protein Data Bank (206 RAS-protein cocomplexes, 190 inhibitor-bound, and 325 unbound, including 204 WT and 517 mutated structures), we created a broad conformational classification based on the spatial positions of Y32 in SW1 and Y71 in SW2. Clustering all well-modeled SW1 and SW2 loops using a density-based machine learning algorithm defined additional conformational subsets, some previously undescribed. Three SW1 conformations and nine SW2 conformations were identified, each associated with different nucleotide states (GTP-bound, nucleotide-free, and GDP-bound) and specific bound proteins or inhibitor sites. The GTP-bound SW1 conformation could be further subdivided on the basis of the hydrogen bond type made between Y32 and the GTP γ-phosphate. Further analysis clarified the catalytic impact of G12D and G12V mutations and the inhibitor chemistries that bind to each druggable RAS conformation. Overall, this study has expanded our understanding of RAS structural biology, which could facilitate future RAS drug discovery. SIGNIFICANCE: Analysis of >700 RAS structures helps define an expanded landscape of active, inactive, and druggable RAS conformations, the structural impact of common RAS mutations, and previously uncharacterized RAS inhibitor-binding modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.