Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536216›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

Delineating the RAS Conformational Landscape.

Mitchell I Parker, Joshua E Meyer, Erica A Golemis, Roland L Dunbrack

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular principles underlying aggressive cancers.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitchell I ParkerProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-3904
Joshua E MeyerProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7585-5738
Erica A GolemisProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3618-3673
Roland L DunbrackProgram in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-6667
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Structural Bioinformatics of Proteins and Protein Complexes and Applications to Cancer BiologyR35GM122517 · NIGMS · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI ROLAND L DUNBRACK · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Creating a Unified RAS Structural Nomenclature to Compare the Impact of Oncogenic Mutations on KRAS, NRAS, and HRASF30GM142263 · NIGMS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER, MITCHELL ISAAC · 2021 to 2024
$191k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NIGMS NIH HHS F30 GM142263NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in RAS isoforms (KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS) are among the most frequent oncogenic alterations in many cancers, making these proteins high priority therapeutic targets. Effectively targeting RAS isoforms requires an exact understanding of their active, inactive, and druggable conformations. However, there is no structural catalog of RAS conformations to guide therapeutic targeting or examining the structural impact of RAS mutations. Here we present an expanded classification of RAS conformations based on analyses of the catalytic switch 1 (SW1) and switch 2 (SW2) loops. From 721 human KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS structures available in the Protein Data Bank (206 RAS-protein cocomplexes, 190 inhibitor-bound, and 325 unbound, including 204 WT and 517 mutated structures), we created a broad conformational classification based on the spatial positions of Y32 in SW1 and Y71 in SW2. Clustering all well-modeled SW1 and SW2 loops using a density-based machine learning algorithm defined additional conformational subsets, some previously undescribed. Three SW1 conformations and nine SW2 conformations were identified, each associated with different nucleotide states (GTP-bound, nucleotide-free, and GDP-bound) and specific bound proteins or inhibitor sites. The GTP-bound SW1 conformation could be further subdivided on the basis of the hydrogen bond type made between Y32 and the GTP γ-phosphate. Further analysis clarified the catalytic impact of G12D and G12V mutations and the inhibitor chemistries that bind to each druggable RAS conformation. Overall, this study has expanded our understanding of RAS structural biology, which could facilitate future RAS drug discovery. SIGNIFICANCE: Analysis of >700 RAS structures helps define an expanded landscape of active, inactive, and druggable RAS conformations, the structural impact of common RAS mutations, and previously uncharacterized RAS inhibitor-binding modes.

Indexed as

Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsGuanosine TriphosphateHumansMutationProtein ConformationProtein IsoformsGuanosine TriphosphateProtein IsoformsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35536216
PMCPMC9256797
OpenAlexW4280559625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.