Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536052›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Circulation of

Filippo Barsi, Elena Carra, Matteo Ricchi, Gisella Gnali, Giuliano Pisoni, Simone Russo, Anita Filippi, Norma Arrigoni, Ruth N Zadoks, Chiara Garbarino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Veterinary macrolides againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Comparative Genomic Analysis of Bovine and Publicly Available HumanAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dairy FarmPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Case Series onVeterinary and animal science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluation of Control Program AgainstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Filippo BarsiExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Elena CarraExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Matteo RicchiExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4923-0216
Gisella GnaliVeterinary Practitioner, Brescia, Italy.
Giuliano PisoniVeterinary Zoetis Italia srl, Rome, Italy.
Simone RussoExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Anita FilippiExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Norma ArrigoniExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Ruth N ZadoksSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia.
Chiara GarbarinoExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute in Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report here on an outbreak of mastitis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae, or group B Streptococcus, in a northern Italy (Lombardy Region) free stall dairy farm. This outbreak was unusual because it occurred in a closed dairy herd and proved to be extremely difficult to resolve even after the application of the classical control procedures, which are specifically focused on the contagious nature of S. agalactiae. In order to better understand the potential origins of the pathogen and the critical points that could impair the eradication program and to investigate the possible presence of S. agalactiae in sources outside the mammary gland, we collected 656 individual composite milk samples, 577 samples from extramammary body sites (289 rectal, 284 vaginal, and four throat samples from milking cows, dry cows, heifers, and calves), and 81 samples from the cattle environment, including the milking parlor and the barn. Twenty-two S. agalactiae isolates were obtained from lactating cows or their environment. Of these, nine were isolated from milk, two were from rectal swabs, and two were from vaginal swabs, while nine were isolated from environmental samples. Based on molecular serotyping, pilus island (PI) typing and multilocus sequence typing, all isolates belonged to serotype III, pilus type PI-1/2b, and sequence type 103 (ST103), a type previously described to have an environmental transmission cycle and a potential human origin. Once the classical mastitis control measures were supplemented with environmental hygiene measures, herd monitoring using bulk tank milk revealed no further positive results for S. agalactiae, and the outbreak was considered resolved.

Indexed as

Mastitis, BovineStreptococcal InfectionsAnimalsCattleDairyingFarmsFemaleHumansLactationMilkStreptococcus agalactiaecattlemastitissequence type 103ST103Streptococcus agalactiaeveterinary epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID35536052
PMCPMC9195933
OpenAlexW4229443129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.