Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536029›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Simulated Leaching of Foliar Applied Copper Bactericides on the Soil Microbiome Utilizing Various Beta Diversity Resemblance Measurements.

A Strayer-Scherer, S Timilsina, Y Y Liao, M Young, E N Rosskopf, G E Vallad, E M Goss, S Santra, J B Jones, J C Hong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Strayer-Scherer *Department of Plant Pathology, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-8038
S Timilsina *Department of Plant Pathology, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Y Y LiaoDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
M YoungNanoScience Technology Center and Burnett School of Biomedical Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
E N RosskopfUSDA ARS, United States Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA.
G E ValladDepartment of Plant Pathology, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Wimauma, Florida, USA.
E M GossDepartment of Plant Pathology and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3512-2107
S SantraNanoScience Technology Center, Department of Chemistry, Materials Science and Engineering and Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
J B JonesDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0061-470X
J C HongUSDA ARS, United States Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA.
M L ParetDepartment of Plant Pathology, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Floridagrid.15276.37, Quincy, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-0418
University of Florida · USUniversity of Central Florida · USU.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper bactericides are routinely used to control Xanthomonas perforans (XP), causal agent of bacterial spot of tomato. Given the widespread tolerance to copper in XP strains in FL, USA, nanotechnology-based elemental composites have gained interest for their potential applications in agriculture in part due to their enhanced antimicrobial properties and toxicity to copper-tolerant strains. However, little is known about the potential impact of conventional copper bactericides as well as nano-based elemental composites on soil microbial communities, as determined by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rDNA. We compared the effects of 2 and 200 μg/mL of core-shell (CS), a metallic copper composite, and a conventional copper bactericide + mancozeb (Cu+Man) on the soil microbiome. These treatments were compared to three controls, the microbial profile of the soil prior to application of copper products, a water application, and spiking the soil with a soilborne phytobacterium, Ralstonia solanacearum (RS). The RS treatment was included to determine if downstream analysis could detect the artificial inoculation. Utilizing multiple β diversity measurements, each emphasizing various tenets of ecology, provided a greater perspective of the effects the treatments had on the microbiome. Analysis of HTS data revealed that the two treatments containing field applied rates of metallic copper, CS 200 and Cu+Man, had the largest impact on the soil microbiome at seven-days posttreatment compared to water. However, we simulated field applied rates of CS 200 entering the soil by treating soil with CS 2 and determined this concentration had a negligible effect on the soil microbiome.

Indexed as

CopperMicrobiotaAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansSoilSoil MicrobiologyWaterXanthomonasAnti-Bacterial AgentsCopperSoilWaterbacteriadiversity measurementshigh-throughput sequencing analysisnanomaterialssoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID35536029
PMCPMC9241806
OpenAlexW4229440565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.