Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35536028›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Phage Cocktail Targeting STEC O157:H7 Has Comparable Efficacy and Superior Recovery Compared with Enrofloxacin in an Enteric Murine Model.

Yuxin Wang, Dinesh Subedi, Jin Li, Jiaoling Wu, Jianluan Ren, Feng Xue, Jianjun Dai, Jeremy J Barr, Fang Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A conserved KL2-capsule-related phage-resistant mechanism in carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment ofViruses · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevalence and Implications of Shiga Toxin-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Yuxin WangMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Dinesh SubediSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash Universitygrid.1002.3, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1357-9520
Jin LiMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jiaoling WuMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jianluan RenMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Feng XueMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jianjun DaiMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jeremy J BarrSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash Universitygrid.1002.3, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5603-5294
Fang TangMOE Joint International Research Laboratory of Animal Health and Food Safety; Key Laboratory of Animal Bacteriology, Ministry of Agriculture; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0933-0685
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

O157:H7 is the most important Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serotype in relation to public health. Given that antibiotics may contribute to the exacerbation of STEC-related disease and an increased frequency of antibiotic-resistant strains, bacteriophage (phage) therapy is considered a promising alternative. However, phage therapy targeting enteric pathogens is still underdeveloped with many confounding effects from the microbiota. Here we comprehensively compared the therapeutic efficacy of a phage cocktail with the antibiotic enrofloxacin in a mouse model of STEC O157:H7 EDL933 infection. Enrofloxacin treatment provided 100% survival and the phage cocktail treatment provided 90% survival. However, in terms of mouse recovery, the phage cocktail outperformed enrofloxacin in all measured outcomes. Compared with enrofloxacin treatment, phage treatment led to a faster elimination of enteric pathogens, decreased expression levels of inflammatory markers, increased weight gain, maintenance of a stable relative organ weight, and improved homeostasis of the gut microbiota. These results provide support for the potential of phage therapy to combat enteric pathogens and suggest that phage treatment leads to enhanced recovery of infected mice compared with antibiotics.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisease Models, AnimalEnrofloxacinMiceAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnrofloxacinantibioticsgut microbiotaphage cocktailtherapy

Identifiers

PMID35536028
PMCPMC9241756
OpenAlexW4229453318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.