ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2022
Machine Learning on DNA-Encoded Library Count Data Using an Uncertainty-Aware Probabilistic Loss Function.
Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Versatile DNA-Encoded Library Platform for the Discovery of Highly Cooperative Chemical Inducers of Proximity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Linkerability of Protein Ligands: Insights From Cocrystal Structures and Implications for DNA-Encoded Libraries.Molecular informatics · 2026Article
- Current Computational Approaches for the Discovery of Novel Anticancer Agents Targeting VEGFR and SIRT Signaling Pathways.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Solid-phase DNA-encoded library synthesis: a master builder's instructions.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Developments and challenges in hit progression within fragment-based drug discovery.Nature communications · 2026Review
- A hybrid unsupervised methodology on artificial intelligence filtering for automatically processing cellular DNA-encoded library (DEL) datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Enabling Open Machine Learning of Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Encoded Library Selections to Accelerate the Discovery of Small Molecule Protein Binders.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Protein-ligand data at scale to support machine learning.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Evaluation of DNA encoded library and machine learning model combinations for hit discovery.npj drug discovery · 2025Article
- Publishing neural networks in drug discovery might compromise training data privacy.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Development of an FKBP12-recruiting chemical-induced proximity DNA-encoded library and its application to discover an autophagy potentiator.Cell chemical biology · 2025Article
- Highly Selective Novel Heme Oxygenase-1 Hits Found by DNA-Encoded Library Machine Learning beyond the DEL Chemical Space.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024Article
- Machine learning in preclinical drug discovery.Nature chemical biology · 2024Review
- Control of the antitumour activity and specificity of CAR T cells via organic adapters covalently tethering the CAR to tumour cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- DNA-encoded library-enabled discovery of proximity-inducing small molecules.Nature chemical biology · 2024Article
- Evolution of chemistry and selection technology for DNA-encoded library.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Review
- Rational Screening for Cooperativity in Small-Molecule Inducers of Protein-Protein Associations.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
- Building Block-Based Binding Predictions for DNA-Encoded Libraries.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approach for the Discovery of Tumor-Targeting Small Organic Ligands from DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Data Analysis Method for Cell-Based Selection of DNA-Encoded Libraries.ACS omega · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA-encoded library (DEL) screening and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling are two techniques used in drug discovery to find novel small molecules that bind a protein target. Applying QSAR modeling to DEL selection data can facilitate the selection of compounds for off-DNA synthesis and evaluation. Such a combined approach has been done recently by training binary classifiers to learn DEL enrichments of aggregated "disynthons" in order to accommodate the sparse and noisy nature of DEL data. However, a binary classification model cannot distinguish between different levels of enrichment, and information is potentially lost during disynthon aggregation. Here, we demonstrate a regression approach to learning DEL enrichments of individual molecules, using a custom negative-log-likelihood loss function that effectively denoises DEL data and introduces opportunities for visualization of learned structure-activity relationships. Our approach explicitly models the Poisson statistics of the sequencing process used in the DEL experimental workflow under a frequentist view. We illustrate this approach on a DEL dataset of 108,528 compounds screened against carbonic anhydrase (CAIX), and a dataset of 5,655,000 compounds screened against soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) and SIRT2. Due to the treatment of uncertainty in the data through the negative-log-likelihood loss used during training, the models can ignore low-confidence outliers. While our approach does not demonstrate a benefit for extrapolation to novel structures, we expect our denoising and visualization pipeline to be useful in identifying structure-activity trends and highly enriched pharmacophores in DEL data. Further, this approach to uncertainty-aware regression modeling is applicable to other sparse or noisy datasets where the nature of stochasticity is known or can be modeled; in particular, the Poisson enrichment ratio metric we use can apply to other settings that compare sequencing count data between two experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.