Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535699›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2022

Added value of CRP to clinical features when assessing appendicitis in children.

Guus C G H Blok, Eelke D Nikkels, Johan van der Lei, Marjolein Y Berger, Gea A Holtman

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06762275 (Optimizing Management of Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06762275 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Optimizing Management of Children Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain in Primary Care: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Clinical Prediction Rule Including C-reactive Protein for Appendicitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2025 to 2029Enrolled566ConditionsAppendicitis Acute, Acute Abdomen in ChildrenArmsDiagnostic strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. C-reactive protein and digestive pathologies: A narrative review for daily clinical use.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guus C G H BlokDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1654-6844
Eelke D NikkelsDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johan van der LeiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9203-3410
Marjolein Y BergerDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9906-3666
Gea A HoltmanDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-767X
University Medical Center Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) for appendicitis in children has not been evaluated in primary care. As biochemical responses and differential diagnoses vary with age, separate evaluation in children and adults is needed.

objectivesTo determine whether adding CRP to symptoms and signs improves the diagnosis of appendicitis in children with acute abdominal pain in primary care.

methodsA retrospective cohort study in Dutch general practice. Data was collected from the Integrated Primary Care Information database between 2010 and 2016. We included children aged 4-18 years, with no history of appendicitis, presenting with acute abdominal pain, and having a CRP test. Initial CRP levels were related to the specialist's diagnosis of appendicitis, and the test's characteristics were calculated for multiple cut-offs. The value of adding CRP to signs and symptoms was analysed by logistic regression.

resultsWe identified 1076 eligible children, among whom 203 were referred for specialist evaluation and 70 had appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of a CRP cut-off ≥10 mg/L were 0.87 (95%CI, 0.77-0.94) and 0.77 (95%CI, 0.74-0.79), respectively. When symptoms lasted > 48 h, this sensitivity increased to 1.00. Positive predictive values for CRP alone were low (0.18-0.38) for all cut-off values (6-100 mg/L). Adding CRP increased the area under the curve from 0.82 (95%CI, 0.78-0.87) to 0.88 (95%CI, 0.84-0.91), and decision curve analysis confirmed that its addition provided the highest net benefit.

conclusionCRP adds value to history and physical examination when diagnosing appendicitis in children presenting acute abdominal pain in primary care. Appendicitis is least likely if the CRP value is < 10 mg/L and symptoms have been present for > 48 h.

Indexed as

AppendicitisC-Reactive ProteinAbdominal PainAcute DiseaseAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansLeukocyte CountRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityC-Reactive Proteinabdominal painappendicitischildC-reactive proteinpoint-of-care testingPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35535699
PMCPMC9103685
OpenAlexW4229445977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.