Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535672›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2022

Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Takayuki Gyoten, Eisuke Amiya, Osamu Kinoshita, Masaki Tsuji, Mitsutoshi Kimura, Masaru Hatano, Minoru Ono

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Deactivation of LVAD support for myocardial recovery-surgical perspectives.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. HeartMate 3 Explantation Using Felt Plug for Ventriculotomy Occlusion.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki GyotenDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7960-6704
Eisuke AmiyaDepartment of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu KinoshitaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki TsujiDepartment of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsutoshi KimuraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru HatanoDepartment of Therapeutic Strategy for Heart Failure, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru OnoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
University of Tokyo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe removal of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after myocardial recovery can provide survival benefits with freedom from LVAD-associated complications. However, in the absence of standardization, the weaning evaluation and surgical strategy differ widely among centres. Therefore, we analysed the experiences of LVAD explantation with our protocol in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and investigated the validity of our weaning evaluation and surgical strategy from the perspective of optimal long-term survival. METHODS AND

resultsAll LVAD explantation patients in our institution between May 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by our three-phase weaning assessment: (i) clinical stability with improved cardiac function under LVAD support; (ii) haemodynamic stability shown by ramp-loading and saline-loading test; (iii) intraoperative pump-off test. Explant surgery involved removal of the whole system including driveline, pump, sewing ring and outflow-graft, and closure of an apical hole. Intra-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative outcomes, including all-cause mortality and LVAD associated major complications, were retrospectively analysed. A total of 12 DCM patients (DuraHeart, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 6; HeartMate 3, n = 2) had myocardial recovery after a median 10 months [interquartile range (IQR); 6.3-15 months] support and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 37 y, IQR; 34-41 years; 83% men]. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% (IQR; 12-23%) at LVAD-implantation and 54% (IQR: 45-55%) before LVAD explantation (P < 0.001). There were no perioperative complications and median ICU stay was 4 days (IQR; 2-4 days). All patients were discharged after a median of 24 days (IQR: 17-28 days) postoperatively. No patient suffered from any cardiac event (heart failure hospitalization, re-implantation of LVAD, or heart transplantation) at a median of 40 months (IQR: 17-58 months) follow up. All patients are alive with NYHA functional class 1 with preserved left ventricular function.

conclusionsThe evaluation of LVAD explant candidates by our weaning protocol was safe and effective. In the patients completing our protocol successfully, LVAD explantation is feasible and an excellent long-term cardiac event free-survival seems to be achieved.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, DilatedHeart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftHeart failureLeft ventricular assist deviceLVAD explantationMechanical circulatory supportWeaning protocol

Identifiers

PMID35535672
PMCPMC9288791
OpenAlexW4229442663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.