Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535620›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction.

Muhammad Umer Butt, Nazli Okumus, Ahmad Jabri, Charles Thomas, Yasir Tarabichi, Saima Karim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Three-year incidence of pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus node dysfunction receiving ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  3. Sinus node dysfunction after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter: A case report.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Umer ButtDepartment of Cardiology New York University Langone Health New York NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7920-3668
Nazli OkumusHeart and Vascular Institute MetroHealth Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH.
Ahmad JabriHeart and Vascular Institute MetroHealth Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH.
Charles ThomasHealth Education Campus Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH.
Yasir TarabichiDivision of Pulmonary Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine MetroHealth Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University Cleveland OH.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-5654
Saima KarimDepartment of Cardiology New York University Langone Health New York NY.ORCID 0000-0001-6252-2400
MetroHealth Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. Methods and Results We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 66,  595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85-1.20]). Conclusions Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.70]).

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPacemaker, ArtificialCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesSick Sinus SyndromeTreatment Outcomeatrial fibrillation ablationatrial fibrillation durationpacemaker implantationsick sinus syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35535620
PMCPMC9496447
OpenAlexW4280498726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.