Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535608›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Integrated species distribution models reveal spatiotemporal patterns of human-wildlife conflict.

Mason Fidino, Elizabeth W Lehrer, Cria A M Kay, Nicholas T Yarmey, Maureen H Murray, Kimberly Fake, Henry C Adams, Seth B Magle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrated species distribution models reveal spatiotemporal patterns of human-wildlife conflict.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mason FidinoConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-0307
Elizabeth W LehrerConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5748-6521
Cria A M KayNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1323-8993
Nicholas T YarmeyPrentice Institute for Global Population and Economy, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-1591
Maureen H MurrayConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-0794
Kimberly FakeConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Henry C AdamsConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-4135
Seth B MagleConservation and Science Department, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0275-3885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To mitigate human-wildlife conflict it is imperative to know where and when conflict occurs. However, standard methods used to predict the occurrence of human-wildlife conflict often fail to recognize how a species distribution likely limits where and when conflict may happen. As such, methods that predict human-wildlife conflict could be improved if they could identify where conflict will occur relative to species' underlying distribution. To this end, we used an integrated species distribution model that combined presence-only wildlife complaints with data from a systematic camera trapping survey throughout Chicago, Illinois. This model draws upon both data sources to estimate a latent distribution of species; in addition, the model can estimate where conflict is most likely to occur within that distribution. We modeled the occupancy and conflict potential of coyote (Canis latrans), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and raccoon (Procyon lotor) as a function of urban intensity, per capita income, and home vacancy rates throughout Chicago. Overall, the distribution of each species constrained the spatiotemporal patterns of conflict throughout the city of Chicago. Within each species distribution, we found that human-wildlife conflict was most likely to occur where humans and wildlife habitat overlap (e.g., featuring higher-than-average canopy cover and housing density). Furthermore, human-wildlife conflict was most likely to occur in high-income neighborhoods for Virginia opossum and raccoon, despite the fact that those two species have higher occupancy in low-income neighborhoods. As such, knowing where species are distributed can inform guidelines on where wildlife management should be focused, especially if it overlaps with human habitats. Finally, because this integrated model can incorporate data that have already been collected by wildlife managers or city officials, this approach could be used to develop stronger collaborations with wildlife management agencies and conduct applied research that will inform landscape-scale wildlife management.

Indexed as

Animals, WildRaccoonsAnimalsCitiesEcosystemHumansOpossumshuman-wildlife conflictintegrated modelmammalsoccupancy modelurban ecology

Identifiers

PMID35535608
PMCPMC13425740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.