Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535504›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2022

Key questions: research priorities for student mental health.

Katie Sampson, Michael Priestley, Alyson L Dodd, Emma Broglia, Til Wykes, Dan Robotham, Katie Tyrrell, Marta Ortega Vega, Nicola C Byrom

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06350877 (One-on-one and Group-based Physical Activity Intervention Compared to a Wait-list Control for Post-secondary Student Mental Health and Well-being), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06350877 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

One-on-one and Group-based Physical Activity Intervention Compared to a Wait-list Control for Post-secondary Student Mental Health and Well-being: A 3-arm Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2024 to 2025Enrolled93ConditionsPhysical Activity, Mental Health IssueArmsPhysical Activity Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie SampsonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, UK.
Michael PriestleySchool of Education, Durham University, UK.
Alyson L DoddDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-2272
Emma BrogliaSchool of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK.
Til WykesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5881-8003
Dan RobothamThe McPin Foundation, UK.
Katie TyrrellResearch Directorate, University of Suffolk, UK.
Marta Ortega VegaMaudsley Learning, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Nicola C ByromDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high prevalence of mental distress among university students is gaining academic, policy and public attention. As the volume of research into student mental health increases, it is important to involve students to ensure that the evidence produced can translate into meaningful improvements.

aimsFor the first time, we consult UK students about their research priorities on student mental health.

methodThis priority setting exercise involved current UK university students who were asked to submit three research questions relating to student mental health. Responses were aggregated into themes through content analysis and considered in the context of existing research. Students were involved throughout the project, including inception, design, recruitment, analysis and dissemination.

resultsUK university students (N = 385) submitted 991 questions, categorised into seven themes: epidemiology, causes and risk factors, academic factors and work-life balance, sense of belonging, intervention and services, mental health literacy and consequences. Across themes, respondents highlighted the importance of understanding the experience of minority groups.

conclusionsStudents are interested in understanding the causes and consequences of poor mental health at university, across academic and social domains. They would like to improve staff and students' knowledge about mental health, and have access to evidence-based support. Future research should take a broad lens to evaluate interventions; considering how services are designed and delivered, and investigating institutional and behavioural barriers to accessibility, including how this varies across different groups within the student population.

Indexed as

preventionpriority settingqualitative researchStudent mental health

Identifiers

PMID35535504
PMCPMC9169497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.