ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
A Comparative Study of Endometriosis and Normal Endometrium Based on Ultrasound Observation.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: A Comparative Study of Endometriosis and Normal Endometrium Based on Ultrasound Observation.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to compare the microscopic ultrastructure of eutopic endometrium and normal endometrium in patients with endometriosis, to study the specific pathogenesis of endometriosis. In this paper, on the basis of using B-ultrasound technology, several patients with endometriosis were subjected to B-ultrasound to observe the ultrastructure of the eutopic uterine endometrium and compared with the pictures of normal endometrium to carry out the specific analysis between the two ultrastructural comparisons. This study is based on the analysis of B-ultrasound images of patients with endometriosis, compares the difference between their ultrastructure and normal human body, and conducts specific pathological diagnosis and analysis to find out the impact of the endometrium in place. The specific factors of the occurrence of lesions and the corresponding treatment methods are proposed. The experimental results show that the ultrastructure of endometriosis eutopic endometrium is different from that of normal endometrium. The microvilli of secretory cells and the cilia of ciliated cells of the former are abnormally increased and lengthened, and they are superior to B-ultrasound technology. The success rate of the examination is 93.75%, which can play an important role in the specific examination process of patients with endometriosis, as one of the actual indicators of detection. Under the electron microscope, microvilli are tiny finger-like protrusions extending from the cell membrane and the cytoplasm on the free surface of the cell, surrounded by the cell membrane and perpendicular to the cell membrane surface.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.