Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535159›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

In Silico Identification of Hub Genes as Observing Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer Metastasis.

Arulprakasam Ajucarmelprecilla, Jhansi Pandi, Ranjithkumar Dhandapani, Saikishore Ramanathan, Jayaprakash Chinnappan, Ragul Paramasivam, Sathiamoorthi Thangavelu, Abdul-Kareem Mohammed Ghilan, Saad Ali S Aljohani, Atif Abdulwahab A Oyouni and 6 more

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Arulprakasam AjucarmelprecillaMedical Microbiology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-6235
Jhansi PandiMedical Microbiology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5061-9501
Ranjithkumar DhandapaniDepartment of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-8077
Saikishore RamanathanMedical Microbiology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-6160
Jayaprakash ChinnappanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-5829
Ragul ParamasivamChimertech Private Limited, Chennai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-8526
Sathiamoorthi ThangaveluMedical Microbiology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-7064
Abdul-Kareem Mohammed GhilanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Saad Ali S AljohaniDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Alrayan Colleges, Almadinah Almunawarah, Saudi Arabia.
Atif Abdulwahab A OyouniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-4999
Abdullah FarasaniBiomedical Research Unit, Medical Research Center, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6942-5136
Malik A AltayarDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-0686
Hussam Awwadh E AlthagafiBiology Department, Faculty of Science and Arts, Al-Mikhwah, Al-Baha University, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1928-8433
Othman R AlzahraniDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Kaliannan DurairajZoonosis Research Center, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-0432
Anupama ShresthaResearch Institute of Agriculture and Applied Science, Tokha Kathmandu 2356, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-1832
Alagappa University · INUniversity of Tabuk · SABharathiar University · INAl Baha University · SAHimalayan College of Agricultural Sciences and TechnologyJazan University · SAKing Saud University · SAWonkwang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception of hub genes engaged in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) promotes novel ways to diagnose and treat the illness. The goal of this investigation is to recognize the hub genes and reveal its molecular mechanism. In order to explore the potential facts for gastric cancer, the expression profiles of two different datasets were used (GSE161533 and GSE54129). The genes were confirmed to be part of the PPI network for gastric cancer pathogenesis and prognosis. In Cytoscape, the CytoHubba module was used to discover the hub genes. Responsible hub genes were identified. Data from Kaplan-Meier plotter confirmed the predictive value of these distinct genes in various stages of gastric malignancy. Upregulated and downregulated genes were identified to utilize for further analysis. Positive regulation by a host of viral process, positive regulation of granulocyte differentiation, negative regulation of histone H

Identifiers

PMID35535159
PMCPMC9078768
OpenAlexW4225148307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.