Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535121›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

Contrast-enhanced weighted-T1 and FLAIR sequences in MRI of meningeal lesions.

Saeid Roozpeykar, Maryam Azizian, Zohreh Zamani, Marjan Rahimi Farzan, Hossein Abdollahi Veshnavei, Nooshin Tavoosi, Arash Toghyani, Amirhossein Sadeghian, Mahdieh Afzali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Abdominal TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saeid RoozpeykarDepartment of Radiology and Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Maryam AzizianSchool of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman, Iran.
Zohreh ZamaniDepartment of Neurology, Firooz Abadi Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Marjan Rahimi FarzanDepartment of Neurology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
Hossein Abdollahi VeshnaveiDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University Shahrekord Branch Shahrekord, Iran.
Nooshin TavoosiDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University Shahrekord Branch Shahrekord, Iran.
Arash ToghyaniSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Amirhossein SadeghianZabol University of Medical Sciences Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Zabol, Iran.
Mahdieh AfzaliDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in meningeal lesions due to rapid and accurate diagnosis and prevention of serious complications. The aim of the present study was to compare these two sequences after injection of a contrast agent into meningeal lesions. This is a descriptive-analytical study that was performed in 2018-2020 on patients referred to the radiology ward with detection of any meningeal involvements in the MRI images. In addition to T1-W, FLAIR sequence imaging was also performed. Images were initially evaluated by two expert radiologists and a neurologist. The diagnostic values of the sequences were compared. Overall, a total number of 147 patients with meningeal lesions in their brain MRI entered the study. 57.1% of cases (84 patients) had an infectious etiology and 42.9% (63 patients) had a tumoral etiology. T1-W images without contrast were able to diagnose 78 cases of meningitis (92.8% of them), and FLAIR sequences could diagnose 82 patients (97.6% of them). Without contrast injection on MRI, the diagnostic value of T1-W sequence was higher than FLAIR sequence for tumoral lesions (P < 0.01). The enhancement degree of T1-W was higher for tumoral findings (P < 0.01). In contrast, the enhancement degree of the FLAIR sequence was higher for infectious findings, which was also statistically significant (P = 0.015). FLAIR sequences had 92% sensitivity and 85% specificity for diagnosis of brain inflammatory diseases. Similar analysis showed that T1 sequence had 82% sensitivity and 73% specificity for diagnosis of brain inflammatory diseases.

Indexed as

FLAIRmeningeal lesionsMRIT1-W

Identifiers

PMID35535121
PMCPMC9077169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.