Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535083›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

A Comparison of Different Frailty Scores and Impact of Frailty on Outcome in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Surender Singh, Sunil Taneja, Puneeta Tandon, Akash Bansal, Ujjwal Gorsi, Akash Roy, Arka De, Nipun Verma, Madhumita Premkumar, Ajay Duseja and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Surender SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Puneeta TandonDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Akash BansalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ujjwal GorsiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Akash RoyDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arka DeDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nipun VermaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Madhumita PremkumarDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Radha K DhimanDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Virendra SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & aims: There is no "gold standard" tool for the assessment of frailty in cirrhosis. This study compares Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for frailty assessment and ascertains its impact on predicting mortality and hospitalizations in a cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis. Methods: 116 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Frailty assessment was done using LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the first of either all-cause unplanned hospitalization or all-cause mortality occurring within 6 months of the study period. Results: 100 (86.2%) males and 16 (13.8%) females with a mean age of 50.2 (48.4-51.9, 95% CI) years were included. The most common cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) followed by hepatitis C (12.9%) and Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.3%). There was no significant difference in prevalence of frailty based on LFI (43.1%), FFC (36.2%), CFS (44%), and SPPB (47.4%) ( Conclusions: LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS are comparable in frailty assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Importantly, comparability of the commonly used scores for frailty assessment and prediction of hospitalization and mortality allows flexibility for clinical application.

Indexed as

AKI, Acute Kidney InjuryANOVA, Analysis Of VarianceAUC, Area Under the CurveCFS, Clinical Frailty ScaleCI, Confidence IntervalcirrhosisCLDQ, Chronic liver disease questionnaireCT, Computerized TomographyCTP, Child-Turcotte-PughFFC, Fried Frailty CriteriafrailtyFSS, Fatigue severity scaleHCC, Hepatocellular CarcinomaHE, Hepatic EncephalopathyhospitalizationHU, Hounsfield UnitsIBM, International Business MachinesLFI, Liver Frailty IndexMELD, Model for End-Stage Liver DiseaseMELDNa, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with SodiumMMSE, Mini-Mental State ExaminationmortalityNASH, Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisNPV, Negative Predictive ValuePGIMER, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchPPV, Positive Predictive ValueROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic CurveSBP, Spontaneous Bacterial PeritonitisSPPB, Short Physical Performance BatterySPSS, Statistical Package for Social SciencesUTI, Urinary Tract infection

Identifiers

PMID35535083
PMCPMC9077184
OpenAlexW3185329536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.