Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535068›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

FibroScan-AST (FAST) Score for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis - Validation in an Indian Cohort.

Arka De, Amarjit Keisham, Saurabh Mishra, Manu Mehta, Nipun Verma, Madhumita Premkumar, Sunil Taneja, Ashim Das, Virendra Singh, Ajay Duseja

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Work-up for Incidentally Detected NAFLD: How Far is It Worth?Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arka DeDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amarjit KeishamDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Saurabh MishraDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manu MehtaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nipun VermaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Madhumita PremkumarDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ashim DasDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Virendra SinghDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The FibroScan-AST (FAST) score was recently described to detect patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) having elevated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS ≥ 4) and significant fibrosis (≥ F2) on liver biopsy (NASH+ NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2). Aim: The aim of this study was to validate the FAST score in Indian patients with NAFLD and to derive optimal cut-offs. Methods: Sixty patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD [men: 38 (63.3%), age 40 (32-52) years] with all parameters for assessing the FAST score within 3 months of liver histology were retrospectively analysed. Results: Histological NASH was present in 17 patients (28.3%), while 11 (18.3%) patients had NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2. The area under the curve (AUROC) of the FAST score for discriminating NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2 was 0.81. Using cut-offs by Newsome Conclusion: The FAST score demonstrates good AUROC for detecting NASH with significant fibrosis and inflammation on histology. Cut-offs should be recalibrated based on prevalence of disease. Lay summary: India has a high burden of NAFLD with an estimated 25 million patients at potential risk for significant liver disease. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing NASH, although its application in routine clinical practice is limited. Noninvasive tests for the simultaneous detection of steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis are thus the need of the hour. The FAST score has been recently suggested for the noninvasive detection of NASH with significant fibrosis (≥ F2) and inflammation (NAS ≥ 4) on liver biopsy. We validated the utility of the FAST score for detecting NASH with significant fibrosis and inflammation on liver biopsy in Indian patients with NAFLD. This noninvasive, easy-to-use and nonproprietary FAST score can correctly classify disease severity in more than 50% patients. However, our results suggest that cut-offs should be recalibrated based on the anticipated prevalence of NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2 in the given population.

Indexed as

ALT, Alanine AminotransferaseAMA, Antimitochondrial AntibodyANAs, Antinuclear AntibodiesAST, Aspartate aminotransferaseBMI, Body Mass IndexCAP, Controlled Attenuation ParameterFAST, FibroScan-ASTFibroScanFLIP, Fatty Liver Inhibition of ProgressionHTN, HypertensionLKM, Antiliver Kidney Microsomal AntibodyLSM, Liver Stiffness MeasurementNAFLDNAFLD, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseNASH-CRN, NASH Clinical Research NetworkNASH, Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisNAS, NAFLD Activity Scorenonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseSAF, Steatosis, Activity and Fibrosis ScoresteatosisT2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Identifiers

PMID35535068
PMCPMC9077185
OpenAlexW3170095796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.