Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535057›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Rifaximin Vs. Norfloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dibya L Praharaj, Madhumita Premkumar, Akash Roy, Nipun Verma, Sunil Taneja, Ajay Duseja, Radha K Dhiman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03695705 (Randomized Control Trial of Rifaximin and Norfloxacin in Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03695705 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Control Trial of Rifaximin and Norfloxacin in Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis(SBP) in Cirrhotic Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhRan2016 to 2017Enrolled142ConditionsCirrhosis, LiverArmsRifaximin 550 mg twice a day and Norfloxacin 400 mg once a day
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis (2023 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frequent high-level rifaximin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Overview of Complications in Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dibya L PraharajDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Madhumita PremkumarDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Akash RoyDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Nipun VermaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Sunil TanejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Ajay DusejaDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Radha K DhimanDepartment of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) heralds increased mortality in cirrhosis, mandating strategies for prophylaxis. Norfloxacin has been the recommended choice for SBP prevention. However, its use has raised concerns about antibiotic resistance. Rifaximin has been suggested as an alternative. We investigated the efficacy of rifaximin against norfloxacin in primary and secondary prophylaxis of SBP. Methods: In this open-labeled randomized trial, patients with either advanced cirrhosis having ascitic fluid protein levels (<1.5 g/l), Child-Pugh score ≥9 points, serum bilirubin ≥3 mg/dl or impaired renal function (primary prophylaxis group), or those with prior SBP (secondary prophylaxis group) received either norfloxacin (400 mg once daily) or rifaximin (550 mg twice daily). All patients were followed for six months, with the primary endpoint being the development of incident SBP. Results: 142 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 132 met the enrolment criteria; 12 were lost to follow-up, while 4 discontinued treatment. In patients on primary prophylaxis, occurrence of SBP was similar (14.3% vs. 24.3%, Conclusion: In comparison to norfloxacin, rifaximin significantly reduces incident events of SBP, as well as HE when used as a secondary prophylaxis, whereas for primary prophylaxis both have similar effects (NCT03695705). Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03695705.

Indexed as

ACLF, Acute on chronic liver failureAKI, Acute Kidney InjuryantibioticascitescirrhosisCONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsCTP, Child-Turcotte-PughHE, Hepatic encephalopathyhepatic encephalopathyHRS, Hepatorenal syndromeinfectionMELD, Model of end-stage liver diseaseprimaryresistanceSAAG, Serum ascites albumin gradientSBPSBP, Spontaneous bacterial peritonitissecondarysurvivalUGIB, Upper Gastrointestinal BleedVH, Variceal hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID35535057
PMCPMC9077172
OpenAlexW3194492957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.