Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35535033›Full record

ReviewJournal of pest science2022

Reproductive interference and Satyrisation: mechanisms, outcomes and potential use for insect control.

Christina Mitchell, Stewart Leigh, Luke Alphey, Wilfried Haerty, Tracey Chapman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pest science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina MitchellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK.
Stewart LeighSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK.
Luke AlpheyThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Rd, Pirbright, Woking, GU24 0NF UK.
Wilfried HaertyEvolutionary Genomics, Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UG UK.
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2401-8120

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive Interference occurs when interactions between individuals from different species disrupt reproductive processes, resulting in a fitness cost to one or both parties involved. It is typically observed between individuals of closely related species, often upon secondary contact. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, Reproductive Interference is frequently referred to as 'Satyrisation'. It can manifest in various ways, ranging from blocking or reducing the efficacy of mating signals, through to negative effects of heterospecific copulations and the production of sterile or infertile hybrid offspring. The negative fitness effects of Satyrisation in reciprocal matings between species are often asymmetric and it is this aspect, which is most relevant to, and can offer utility in, pest management. In this review, we focus on Satyrisation and outline the mechanisms through which it can operate. We illustrate this by using test cases, and we consider the underlying reasons why the reproductive interactions that comprise Satyrisation occur. We synthesise the key factors affecting the expression of Satyrisation and explore how they have potential utility in developing new routes for the management and control of harmful insects. We consider how Satyrisation might interact with other control mechanisms, and conclude by outlining a framework for its use in control, highlighting some of the important next steps

Indexed as

Interspecific interactionsPest controlPest managementReproductive interferenceSatyr effectSatyrisation

Identifiers

PMID35535033
PMCPMC9068665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.