Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534890›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Assessment of the effectiveness of a course in major chemical incidents for front line health care providers: a pilot study from Saudi Arabia.

Nidaa Bajow, Shahnaz Alkhalil, Nisreen Maghraby, Saleh Alesa, Amal Al Najjar, Samer Aloraifi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nidaa BajowSecurity Forces Hospital Program, P O Box 89489, Riyadh, 11682, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. dr.nidaa@hotmail.com.
Shahnaz AlkhalilFaculty of Engineering and Technology, Alzaytoonah University, Amman, Jordan.
Nisreen MaghrabyKing Fahad University Hospital Collage of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saleh AlesaGeneral Directorate of Medical Services Special Security Forces, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Amal Al NajjarSecurity Forces Hospital Program, P O Box 89489, Riyadh, 11682, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Samer AloraifiHail Health Cluster Ministry of Health, Hail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Security Forces Hospital · SAAl-Zaytoonah University of Jordan · JOKing Fahd Hospital of the University · SAMinistry of Health · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass chemical exposure emergencies are infrequent but can cause injury, illness, or loss of life for large numbers of victims. These emergencies can stretch and challenge the available resources of healthcare systems within the community. Political unrest in the Middle East, including chemical terrorist attacks against civilians in Syria and increasing chemical industry accidents, have highlighted the lack of hospital preparedness for chemical incidents in the region. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a course designed to empower frontline healthcare providers involved in mass casualty incidents with the basic knowledge and essential operational skills for mass chemical exposure incidents in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used to develop a blended learning, simulation enhanced, competency-based course for major chemical incidents for front line healthcare providers. The course was designed by experts from different disciplines (disaster medicine, poisoning / toxicology, and Hazard Material Threat - HAZMAT team) in four stages. The course was piloted over five days at the Officers Club of the Ministry of Interior (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). The 41 participants were from different government health discipline sectors in the country. Pre- and post-tests were used to assess learner knowledge while debriefing sessions after the decontamination triage session and simulation-enhanced exercises were used for team performance assessment.

resultsThe overall knowledge scores were significantly higher in the post-test (69.47%) than the pre-test (46.3%). All four knowledge domains also had significant differences between pre- and post-test results. There were no differences in the pre and post-test scores for healthcare providers from the different health disciplines. A one-year post-event survey demonstrated that participants were satisfied with their knowledge retention. Interestingly, 38.3% had the opportunity to put this knowledge into practice in relation to mass chemical exposure incidents.

conclusionDelivering a foundation level competency-based blended learning course with enhanced simulation training in major chemical incidents for front line healthcare providers may improve their knowledge and skills in response to such incidents. This in turn can improve the level of national preparedness and staff availability and make a crucial difference in reducing the health impacts among victims.

Indexed as

Chemical Hazard ReleaseDisaster PlanningMass Casualty IncidentsEmergenciesHealth PersonnelHumansPilot ProjectsSaudi ArabiaCompetency basedDecontaminationDisaster medicine educationMajor chemical incidentMass chemical exposurePersonal protective equipmentSimulation enhanced training

Identifiers

PMID35534890
PMCPMC9082960
OpenAlexW4229378750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.