Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534843›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Knowledge, attitudes and willingness to organ donation among the general public: a cross-sectional survey in China.

Xiaojing Fan, Meng Li, Heike Rolker, Yingying Li, Jiaoyang Du, Duolao Wang, Enchang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of Dark Triad Personality on Attitudes Toward Brain Death, Organ Donation, and Futile Therapy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaojing Fan *School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Meng Li *School of Marxism, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, No. 548 Binwen Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Heike RolkerFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Yingying LiCentre of Health and Bioethics Research, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Chashan Higher Education Park, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhegjiang, China.
Jiaoyang DuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, No. 76 Yanta West Road,, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, PR China.
Duolao WangDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Enchang LiCentre of Health and Bioethics Research, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Chashan Higher Education Park, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhegjiang, China. wenhai188@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to assess the level of knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to organ donation among the general public in China.

methodsThe study population consisted of 4274 participants from Eastern, Central and Western China. The participants' knowledge, attitudes and willingness to organ donation were collected by a self-designed questionnaire consisting of 30 items. Knowledge is measured by 10 items and presented as a 10 point score, attitudes is measured by 20 items using a 5-step Likert scale and total score ranged between 0 and 80; while the willingness to donate is assessed as binary variable (0 = No; 1 = Yes). A logistic regression model was used to assess the association of knowledge and attitudes with willingness to organ donation, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic confounders.

resultsThe questionnaire response rate was 94.98%. The mean score (± SD) of the general public's knowledge to organ donation was 6.84 ± 1.76, and the mean score (± SD) of attitudes to organ donation was 47.01 ± 9.07. The general public's knowledge and attitudes were the highest in Eastern China, followed by West and Central China. The logistic regression model indicated a positive association between knowledge and the willingness to organ donation (OR = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.08, 1.17; P < 0.001); attitudes were also positively potential determinant of more willingness to organ donation (OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.07, 1.09; P < 0.001).

conclusionsKnowledge and attitudes were found to be positively associated with the Chinese general public's willingness to organ donation. Knowledge about the concept of brain death and the transplant procedure may help raise the rate of willingness to organ donation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTissue and Organ ProcurementChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue DonorsAttitudesChinaKnowledgeOrgan donationWillingness

Identifiers

PMID35534843
PMCPMC9082919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.