SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2023
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Relapse After Facelift.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Okumus Incision: A Hairline-Preserving Temporozygomatic Approach for Facelift Surgery.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative safety and efficacy of SMAS rhytidectomy techniques: a network meta-analysis protocol.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
- Aging of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System of the Face-Novel Biomarkers and Micro-CT Relevance of Facial Anti-Gravity Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evolution of Superficial Muscular Aponeurotic System Facelift Techniques: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Complications and Outcomes.JPRAS open · 2024Review
- Safety and Outcomes in Multiplane Facial Rejuvenation with Tranexamic Acid: A Cohort Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly relapse is an adverse outcome of facelift surgery. The rate of early relapse is an indirect measure of the longevity and efficacy of facelift techniques. However, early relapse after facelift is ill-defined, under-evaluated, and under-reported, and literature data on the subject are dispersed. In this systematic review, we aimed to analyze facelift studies using relapse-related outcomes (RROs). Our secondary aim was to highlight the importance of early relapse as an essential outcome measure.
methodsThe study design was a systematic review of the English literature and meta-analysis of RROs after facelift surgery. RROs that occurred within the first 2 years after surgery were considered "early". Performance, analysis, and reporting were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic search was conducted using the PubMed database as of February 2020. Initial screening was performed using the keywords "facelift", "rhytidectomy", "surgical rejuvenation", "face lift", "rhytidoplasty", and "facial rejuvenation". Articles were excluded by using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
resultsRROs were reported only in 4.4% (19/433) of the papers that underwent full-text review. The frequency of RROs ranged between 0.2 and 50% among facelift papers. The weighted median rate of RROs after facelift surgery was found to be 2.4% in the meta-analysis.
conclusionsFuture research on preventive measures will be successful upon acknowledgment of the actual prevalence of this problem. Consensus on its definition and objective criteria for its diagnosis are required for further progress. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
35534779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.