Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534775›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2022

Lower leg symmetry: a Q3D-CT analysis.

Gwendolyn Vuurberg, Jari Dahmen, Iwan G G Dobbe, Roeland P Kleipool, Batur Hayat, Inger N Sierevelt, Geert Streekstra, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Sjoerd A S Stufkens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gwendolyn VuurbergAmsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.vuurberg@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5008-890X
Jari DahmenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iwan G G DobbeAmsterdam UMC, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roeland P KleipoolAcademic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Batur HayatAmsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inger N SiereveltSpecialized Centre for Orthopedic Research and Education (SCORE), Xpert Orthopedics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert StreekstraAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gino M M J KerkhoffsAmsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd A S StufkensAmsterdam UMC, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn fracture and realignment surgery, the contralateral unaffected side is often used as a model or template for the injured bone even though clinically valuable quantitative data of bilateral symmetry are often unavailable. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to quantify and present the bilateral symmetry of the tibia and fibula.

methodsTwenty bilateral lower-leg CT scans were acquired in healthy volunteers. The left and right tibia and fibula were segmented resulting in three-dimensional polygons for geometrical analyses (volume, surface and length). The distal and proximal segment of the right tibia of each individual was subsequently matched to the left tibia to quantify alignment differences (translation and rotation). Bone symmetry on group level was assessed using the Student's t test and intra-individual differences were assessed using mixed-models analyses.

resultsIntra-individuals differences were found for tibia volume (5.2 ± 3.3 cm

conclusionThis study shows intra-individual tibia asymmetry in both geometric and alignment parameters of which the surgeon needs to be aware in pre-operative planning. The high correlation between tibia and fibula length allows the ipsilateral fibula to aid in estimating the original tibia length post-injury. Future studies need to establish whether the found asymmetry is clinically relevant when the contralateral side is used as reference in corrective surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III cohort study.

Indexed as

LegTibiaCohort StudiesHumansLower ExtremityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTDeformity correctionLower legOsteotomySymmetry quantificationTemplatingTibiae

Identifiers

PMID35534775
PMCPMC9246803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.