Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534747›Full record

ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2022

Analytical study of two feature extraction methods in comparison with deep learning methods for classification of small metal objects.

Somaieh Amraee, Maryam Chinipardaz, Mohammadali Charoosaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Somaieh AmraeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, 64615/334, Iran. s.amraee@jsu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-5774
Maryam ChinipardazDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, 64615/334, Iran.
Mohammadali CharoosaeiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, 64615/334, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper addresses the efficiency of two feature extraction methods for classifying small metal objects including screws, nuts, keys, and coins: the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) and local binary pattern (LBP). The desired features for the labeled images are first extracted and saved in the form of a feature matrix. Using three different classification methods (non-parametric K-nearest neighbors algorithm, support vector machine, and naïve Bayesian method), the images are classified into four different classes. Then, by examining the resulting confusion matrix, the performances of the HOG and LBP approaches are compared for these four classes. The effectiveness of these two methods is also compared with the "You Only Look Once" and faster region-based convolutional neural network approaches, which are based on deep learning. The collected image set in this paper includes 800 labeled training images and 180 test images. The results show that the use of the HOG is more efficient than the use of the LBP. Moreover, a combination of the HOG and LBP provides better results than either alone.

Indexed as

Deep learningHistogram of oriented gradientsk-nearest neighborsLocal binary patternSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35534747
PMCPMC9085991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.