ArticleThe AAPS journal2022
Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Assay Platform for Targeted Protein Degradation Monitoring: Case Study of Antibody Free Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for MALT1 Target Quantification.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Genetic and molecular mechanisms of hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Reliable Identification of Cardiac Maturation Markers Using Robust and Flexible Label-Free Proteomic Quantitation by Spectral Counting on Relatively Abundant Proteins.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Receptor-Mitochondria Crosstalk in the Kynurenine Metabolic Pathway: Integrating Metabolomics and Clinical Mass Spectrometry.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Best practices in the application of parallelism for biomarker assay validation.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- rtmsEcho: An Open-Source R Package for Automated Analysis of Acoustic Ejection Mass Spectrometry Data.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Quantitation of BCAA and BCKA in plasma and patient-centric dried blood microsamples in a clinical setting.Bioanalysis · 2025Article
- Polymerase Chain Reaction Chips for Biomarker Discovery and Validation in Drug Development.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Best Practices for Development and Validation of Enzymatic Activity Assays to Support Drug Development for Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Biomarker Assessment.The AAPS journal · 2024Review
- Evaluation of different isotope dilution mass spectrometry strategies for the characterization of naturally abundant and isotopically labelled peptide standards.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Proteomics data in vitiligo: a scoping review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Applied Clinical Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantification Methods for Lipid-Derived Biomarkers, Steroids and Cannabinoids: Fit-for-Purpose Validation Methods.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decades of discussion and publication have gone into the guidance from the scientific community and the regulatory agencies on the use and validation of pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assays by chromatographic and ligand binding assays for the measurement of drugs and metabolites. These assay validations are well described in the FDA Guidance on Bioanalytical Methods Validation (BMV, 2018). While the BMV included biomarker assay validation, the focus was on understanding the challenges posed in validating biomarker assays and the importance of having reliable biomarker assays when used for regulatory submissions, rather than definition of the appropriate experiments to be performed. Different from PK bioanalysis, analysis of biomarkers can be challenging due to the presence of target analyte(s) in the control matrices used for calibrator and quality control sample preparation, and greater difficulty in procuring appropriate reference standards representative of the endogenous molecule. Several papers have been published offering recommendations for biomarker assay validation. The situational nature of biomarker applications necessitates fit-for-purpose (FFP) assay validation. A unifying theme for FFP analysis is that method validation requirements be consistent with the proposed context of use (COU) for any given biomarker. This communication provides specific recommendations for biomarker assay validation (BAV) by LC-MS, for both small and large molecule biomarkers. The consensus recommendations include creation of a validation plan that contains definition of the COU of the assay, use of the PK assay validation elements that support the COU, and definition of assay validation elements adapted to fit biomarker assays and the acceptance criteria for both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35534647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.