Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534300›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2022

A letter is not enough: Women's preferences for and experiences of receiving breast density information.

Nancy R Kressin, Jolie B Wormwood, Tracy A Battaglia, Priscilla J Slanetz, Christine M Gunn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy R KressinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: nkressin@bu.edu.
Jolie B WormwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Tracy A BattagliaSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Priscilla J SlanetzDepartment of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine M GunnSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Boston University · USDartmouth College · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

Using Community-Engaged Methods to Design a Tool to Promote Informed Breast Cancer Screening Decisions for Low Literacy WomenK07CA221899 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GUNN, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$642k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA221899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite evidence of disparate uptake of breast density (BD) information, little is known about diverse women's preferences for and experiences learning about BD.

methodsTelephone survey among 2306 racially/ethnically and literacy diverse women; qualitative interviews with 61 survey respondents. Responses by participant race/ethnicity and literacy were examined using bivariate, then multivariable analyses. Interviews were content-analyzed for themes.

resultsMost women (80%) preferred learning of personal BD from providers, with higher rates among Non-Hispanic Black (85%) than Non-Hispanic White women (80%); and among Non-Hispanic White than Asian women (72%, all ps<0.05). Women with low literacy less often preferred receiving BD information from providers (76% v. 81%), more often preferring written notification (21% vs. 10%); women with high literacy more often preferred learning through an online portal (9% vs 3%). Most women (93%) received BD information from providers (no between group differences). Qualitative findings detailed women's desires for obtaining BD information from providers, written information, and visual depictions of BD.

conclusionsWhen educating women about BD, one size does not fit all. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Additional educational methods are needed beyond written BD notifications to sufficiently address the varying informational needs and preferences of all USA women.

Indexed as

Breast DensityFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast density notificationHealth literacyPatient experiencesPatient preferencesRacial/ethnic minorities

Identifiers

PMID35534300
PMCPMC9250336
OpenAlexW4220959777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.