Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534217›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2022

Focal therapy for prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation: Oncological and functional results of a single institution study.

William John Yaxley, Troy Gianduzzo, Boon Kua, Rachel Oxford, John William Yaxley

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Results from the PRESERVE trial: an editorial commentary.Translational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Irreversible electroporation as a focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William John YaxleyDepartment of Urology, QEII Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4229-1411
Troy GianduzzoThe University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-3175
Boon KuaWesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-2431
Rachel OxfordWesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5586-2378
John William YaxleyThe University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6566-9037
The University of Queensland · AUWesley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFocal irreversible electroporation (IRE) for prostate cancer aims to reduce quality of life complications, however outcomes data remains limited. We aimed to evaluate histological in-field clearance of prostate cancer at ≥12 months post-IRE. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective review of prospectively acquired data of consecutive patients treated between August 2018 and August 2021. Significant recurrence was defined as a ≥6 mm core Gleason 3+3, or ≥Gleason 3+4 with ≥4 mm tumour length. A second definition of any focus of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥2 was also analysed.

resultsThe median follow-up of the entire cohort is 23 months (range 3-39 mo). For 64 primary IRE procedures, surveillance biopsy was performed in 40/50 (80.0%) with ≥12 months follow-up. Significant in-field recurrence occurred in 3/40 (7.5%), or 4/40 (10.0%) with any focus of ISUP >2. Significant out-of-field recurrence occurred in 5/40 (12.5%). In salvage IRE, three patients (3/6, 50.0%) have undetectable prostate-specific antigen levels, two have no residual cancer on biopsy and one patient had out-of-field recurrence. For sexually active men, erectile function was maintained in 24/28 (85.7%) of primary IRE. No incontinence developed in primary IRE (0/64).

conclusionsFocal primary IRE for prostate cancer is associated with 90% infield ablation of any ISUP grade >2 cancer with a low risk of urinary incontinence or impotence. Surveillance prostate biopsies are required to exclude progression despite a normal post-IRE multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Salvage IRE is a promising option for localised recurrence after prostate radiotherapy with low morbidity.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesProstatic NeoplasmsElectroporationHumansMaleQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeFocal therapyIrreversible electroporationProstate cancerSurveillance biopsyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID35534217
PMCPMC9091832
OpenAlexW4226335820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.