Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534216›Full record

SynthesisInvestigative and clinical urology2022

Effect of local steroids on urethral strictures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Christopher Soliman, Henry Y C Pan, Clancy J Mulholland, Marc A Furrer, Dinesh K Agarwal, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Niranjan J Sathianathen

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher SolimanDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia. chrissol1312@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-6296
Henry Y C PanDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1658-0049
Clancy J MulhollandDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-2775
Marc A FurrerDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8847-6799
Dinesh K AgarwalDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-9773
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8553-5618
Niranjan J SathianathenDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-014X
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrethral stricture disease is common and has high associated morbidity and impact on quality-of-life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarise current evidence on the efficacy of local urethral steroids post-direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for the treatment of urethral strictures in males. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search was performed using reputable databases and registries, up to 22 February 2022. Only randomised control trials in which participants were randomised to DVIU plus local urethral steroids versus DVIU only were included. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Quality of evidence was rated according to the GRADE approach.

resultsThe search identified seven studies in which 365 participants were randomised to DVIU plus local urethral steroids versus DVIU only. The application of local steroids appeared to reduce recurrence rates (risk ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.90) and time-to-recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85). Qmax also improved following steroid application (mean difference, 0.82; 95% CI, -1.02-2.66); however, this was not statistically significant. No heterogeneity was identified between included studies for all outcomes. The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to study limitations with a small sample size and unclear risk-of-bias related to insufficient trial information.

conclusionsCompared to DVIU alone, adjuvant steroids applied to the urethra may reduce risk of recurrence and time-to-recurrence. These findings were statistically significant and likely also clinically significant given low associated costs and risk. However, more robust randomised trials are necessary to enhance the validity of these outcomes.

Indexed as

Urethral StrictureFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSteroidsUrethraSteroidsMaleSteroidsUrethral stricture

Identifiers

PMID35534216
PMCPMC9091821
OpenAlexW4226400273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.