Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534215›Full record

SynthesisInvestigative and clinical urology2022

Diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yan Jin, Jae Hung Jung, Woong Kyu Han, Eu Chang Hwang, Yoonmi Nho, Narae Lee, Ji Eun Yun, Kwang Suk Lee, Sang Hyub Lee, Hakmin Lee and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Investigative and clinical urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yan Jin *National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-1040
Jae Hung Jung *Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-7098
Woong Kyu HanDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-4046
Eu Chang HwangDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2031-124X
Yoonmi NhoNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-4966
Narae LeeNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6155-9906
Ji Eun YunNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-594X
Kwang Suk LeeDepartment of Urology, Gangnam Sevrance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-8393
Sang Hyub LeeDepartment of Urology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4509-5846
Hakmin LeeDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-9958
Su-Yeon YuNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea. suyeon.yu@neca.re.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-5488-5068

Funding

National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency NECA-R-19-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cutoff of 4 ng/mL has been widely used for prostate cancer screening in population-based settings. However, the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL as a cutoff for diagnosing prostate cancer in a hospital setting is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of PSA below 4 ng/mL cutoff in a hospital setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature by searching major databases until March 2020, and a meta-analysis and quality assessment were performed.

resultsA total of 11 studies were included at the completion of the screening process. The meta-analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.16 for a PSA cutoff below 4 ng/mL. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87, the positive likelihood ratio was 1.23, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.46, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 2.64. PSA sensitivities and specificities varied according to the cutoff range: 0.94 and 0.17 for 2 to 2.99 ng/mL, and 0.92 and 0.16 for 3 to 3.99 ng/mL, respectively. No significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of PSA cutoffs in the range of 2 to 2.99 ng/mL and 3 to 3.99 ng/mL were found.

conclusionsAlthough a PSA cutoff <3 ng/mL is relatively more sensitive and specific than PSA ≥3 ng/mL, no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were found in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Therefore, clinicians should choose an appropriate PSA cutoff on the basis of clinical circumstances and patients' characteristics.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHospitalsHumansMaleROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityProstate-Specific AntigenDiagnosisProstate-specific antigenProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35534215
PMCPMC9091828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.