ArticleBMJ open2022
Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Analysis of outcome reporting in common peroneal neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Pooled it
- Core Outcome Sets for Meningioma In Clinical studies (COSMIC): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Article
- How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Neurocognitive evaluation in patients with intracranial Meningiomas: A systematic review.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
- Surgery in octogenarians with intracranial meningiomas improves functional outcome at 1 year.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Hormone therapies in meningioma-where are we?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Review
- The outcomes measured and reported in observational studies of incidental and untreated intracranial meningioma: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- The outcomes measured and reported in intracranial meningioma clinical trials: A systematic review.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Development of a core outcome set for use in adult primary glioma phase III interventional trials: A mixed methods study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMeningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumour in adults. The majority are non-malignant, but a proportion behave more aggressively. Incidental/minimally symptomatic meningioma are often managed by serial imaging. Symptomatic meningioma, those that threaten neurovascular structures, or demonstrate radiological growth, are usually resected as first-line management strategy. For patients in poor clinical condition, or with inoperable, residual or recurrent disease, radiotherapy is often used as primary or adjuvant treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy treatments do not currently exist. There is heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in meningioma clinical studies. Two 'Core Outcome Sets' (COS) will be developed: (COSMIC: Intervention) for use in meningioma clinical effectiveness trials and (COSMIC: Observation) for use in clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two systematic literature reviews and trial registry searches will identify outcomes measured and reported in published and ongoing (1) meningioma clinical effectiveness trials, and (2) clinical studies of incidental/untreated meningioma. Outcomes include those that are clinician reported, patient reported, caregiver reported and based on objective tests (eg, neurocognitive tests), as well as measures of progression and survival. Outcomes will be deduplicated and categorised to generate two long lists. The two long lists will be prioritised through two, two-round, international, modified eDelphi surveys including patients with meningioma, healthcare professionals, researchers and those in caring/supporting roles. The two final COS will be ratified through two 1-day online consensus meetings, with representation from all stakeholder groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional review board (University of Liverpool) approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. Participant eConsent will be obtained prior to participation in the eDelphi surveys and consensus meetings. The two systematic literature reviews and two final COS will be published and freely available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: COMET study ID 1508.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.