Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35534042›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Implementing a new emergency medical triage tool in one health region in Norway: some lessons learned.

Heidi Synnøve Brevik, Karl Ove Hufthammer, Merete Eide Hernes, Rune Bjørneklett, Guttorm Brattebø

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validation of a modified South African triage scale in a high-resource setting: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi Synnøve BrevikEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway heidi.brevik@helse-bergen.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9785-252X
Karl Ove HufthammerCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-9496
Merete Eide HernesEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1822-1990
Rune BjørneklettEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-5743
Guttorm BrattebøDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-5641
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcutely sick or injured patients depend on ambulance and emergency department personnel performing an accurate initial assessment and prioritisation (triage) to effectively identify patients in need of immediate treatment. Triage also ensures that each patient receives fair initial assessment. To improve the patient safety, quality of care, and communication about a patient's medical condition, we implemented a new triage tool (the South African Triage Scale Norway (SATS-N) in all the ambulance services and emergency departments in one health region in Norway. This article describes the lessons we learnt during this implementation process.

methodsThe main framework in this quality improvement (QI) work was the plan-do-study-act cycle. Additional process sources were 'The Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for improvement' and the Norwegian Patient Safety Programme.

resultsBased on the QI process as a whole, we defined subjects influencing this work to be successful, such as identifying areas for improvement, establishing multidisciplinary teams, coaching, implementing measurements and securing sustainability. After these subjects were connected to the relevant challenges and desired effects, we described the lessons we learnt during this comprehensive QI process.

conclusionWe learnt the importance of following a structured framework for QI process during the implementation of the SATS-N triage tool. Furthermore, securing anchoring at all levels, from the managements to the medical professionals in direct patient-orientated work, was relevant important. Moreover, establishing multidisciplinary teams with ambulance personnel, emergency department nurses and doctors with various medical specialties provided ownership to the participants. Meanwhile, coaching provided necessary security for the staff directly involved in caring for patients. Keeping the spirit and perseverance high were important factors in completing the implementation. Establishment of the regional network group was found to be important for sustainability and further improvements.

Indexed as

One HealthPhysiciansHumansNorwayQuality ImprovementTriageEmergency departmentHealthcare quality improvementPrehospital care

Identifiers

PMID35534042
PMCPMC9086633
OpenAlexW4280599625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.