Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35533500›Full record

Observational studyEBioMedicine2022

Plasma neurofilament light chain protein as a predictor of days in delirium and deep sedation, mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients.

Valerie J Page, Leiv Otto Watne, Amanda Heslegrave, Allan Clark, Daniel F McAuley, Robert D Sanders, Henrik Zetterberg

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in EBioMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Valerie J PageDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Unit, Watford General Hospital, Vicarage Road, Watford WD18 0HB, UK; Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Electronic address: valerie.page2@nhs.net.
Leiv Otto WatneDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo Delirium Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Amanda HeslegraveDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK.
Allan ClarkNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, The Queen's University of Belfast, Health Sciences Building, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Robert D SandersSydney Medical School/Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Hong Kong Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hong Kong, China.
Oslo University Hospital · NOQueen's University Belfast · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEThe University of Sydney · AUUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBWatford General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium predicts poor outcomes, however identifying patients with the worst outcomes is challenging. Plasma neurofilament light protein (NfL) is a sensitive indicator of neuronal damage. We undertook an exploratory observational study to determine the association between plasma NfL and delirium in the critically ill.

methodsMoDUS was a randomised placebo-controlled delirium trial of simvastatin done in an UK adult general ICU. We measured NfL levels in plasma samples using a Single molecule array (Simoa) platform. We explored associations between patient's plasma NfL levels and number of delirium days, and clinical outcomes. The control group for baseline NfL were preoperative patients undergoing major surgery.

findingsThe majority of critically ill patients already had a high NfL level on admission. Patients with higher plasma NfL levels at days one and three spent more days in delirium or deep sedation. Patients with zero or one day in delirium or deep sedation had day one mean concentrations of 37.8 pg/ml (SD 32.6) compared with 96.5 pg/ml (SD 106.1)) for patients with two days or more, p-value 0.002 linear mixed effects model. Survivors discharged before 14 days had lower mean plasma NfL concentrations compared to those with longer hospital stays and/or who died within six months. The area under ROC curve for predicting death within six months using day one NfL was 0.81 (0.7,0.9).

interpretationMeasurement of plasma NfL within three days of admission may be useful to identify those patients with worse clinical outcomes, and as an enrichment strategy for future delirium interventional trials in the critically ill.

fundingAlzheimer's Society UK, UK Dementia Research Institute.

Indexed as

Deep SedationDeliriumNeurofilament ProteinsAdultBiomarkersCritical IllnessHumansIntermediate FilamentsLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSimvastatinBiomarkersNeurofilament ProteinsSimvastatinBiomarkerCritical careDeliriumIntensive careNeurofilament light protein

Identifiers

PMID35533500
PMCPMC9092506
OpenAlexW4229078750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.