Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35533459›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Multi-contrast computed tomography healthy kidney atlas.

Ho Hin Lee, Yucheng Tang, Kaiwen Xu, Shunxing Bao, Agnes B Fogo, Raymond Harris, Mark P de Caestecker, Mattias Heinrich, Jeffrey M Spraggins, Yuankai Huo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterizing Low-cost Registration for Photographic Images to Computed Tomography.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Unsupervised Registration Refinement for Generating Unbiased Eye Atlas.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ho Hin LeeVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, USA. Electronic address: ho.hin.lee@vanderbilt.edu.
Yucheng TangVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, USA.
Kaiwen XuVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, USA.
Shunxing BaoVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, USA.
Agnes B FogoVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Nashville, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Nashville, USA.
Raymond HarrisVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
Mark P de CaesteckerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Nashville, USA.
Mattias HeinrichUniversity of Lübeck, Institute of Medical Informatics, Germany.
Jeffrey M SpragginsVanderbilt University, Department of Biochemistry, Nashville, USA.
Yuankai HuoVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Nashville, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Vanderbilt University Biomolecular Multimodal Imaging Center for 3-Dimensional Mapping of the Human KidneyU54DK134302 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SPRAGGINS, JEFFREY M · 2022 to 2025
$7.1M
Vanderbilt University Biomolecular Multimodal Imaging Center for 3-Dimensional Tissue MappingU54DK120058 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CAPRIOLI, RICHARD M, SPRAGGINS, JEFFREY M · 2018 to 2021
$5.7M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Computer-Assisted functional neurosurgeryR01EB006136 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2006 to 2013
$4.0M
Computer-Assited Functional NeurosurgeryR01NS095291 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M., DHAESE, PIERRE F. · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006136NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK120058NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK134302NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction of three-dimensional multi-modal tissue maps provides an opportunity to spur interdisciplinary innovations across temporal and spatial scales through information integration. While the preponderance of effort is allocated to the cellular level and explore the changes in cell interactions and organizations, contextualizing findings within organs and systems is essential to visualize and interpret higher resolution linkage across scales. There is a substantial normal variation of kidney morphometry and appearance across body size, sex, and imaging protocols in abdominal computed tomography (CT). A volumetric atlas framework is needed to integrate and visualize the variability across scales. However, there is no abdominal and retroperitoneal organs atlas framework for multi-contrast CT. Hence, we proposed a high-resolution CT retroperitoneal atlas specifically optimized for the kidney organ across non-contrast CT and early arterial, late arterial, venous and delayed contrast-enhanced CT. We introduce a deep learning-based volume interest extraction method by localizing the 2D slices with a representative score and crop within the range of the abdominal interest. An automated two-stage hierarchal registration pipeline is then performed to register abdominal volumes to a high-resolution CT atlas template with DEEDS affine and non-rigid registration. To generate and evaluate the atlas framework, multi-contrast modality CT scans of 500 subjects (without reported history of renal disease, age: 15-50 years, 250 males & 250 females) were processed. PDD-Net with affine registration achieved the best overall mean DICE for portal venous phase multi-organs label transfer with the registration pipeline (0.540 ± 0.275, p < 0.0001 Wilcoxon signed-rank test) comparing to the other registration tools. It also demonstrated the best performance with the median DICE over 0.8 in transferring the kidney information to the atlas space. DEEDS perform constantly with stable transferring performance in all phases average mapping including significant clear boundary of kidneys with contrastive characteristics, while PDD-Net only demonstrates a stable kidney registration in the average mapping of early and late arterial, and portal venous phase. The variance mappings demonstrate the low intensity variance in the kidney regions with DEEDS across all contrast phases and with PDD-Net across late arterial and portal venous phase. We demonstrate a stable generalizability of the atlas template for integrating the normal kidney variation from small to large, across contrast modalities and populations with great variability of demographics. The linkage of atlas and demographics provided a better understanding of the variation of kidney anatomy across populations.

Indexed as

Radiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDeep learningKidney atlasMedical image registrationMulti-contrast computed tomographyRetroperitoneal atlas

Identifiers

PMID35533459
PMCPMC10243466
OpenAlexW3117043207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.