Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35533437›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of otolaryngology

COVID-19 during pregnancy and its impact on the developing auditory system.

Sangamanatha Ankmnal Veeranna, Patricia LeeAnn Youngblood, Lucy Bradshaw, Charles G Marx

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of otolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Impact on Hearing Among SARS COV-2 Infected Adults and Children Born to Gestational COVID-19 Infected Mothers: A Prospective Case Control Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sangamanatha Ankmnal VeerannaCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, J.B. George Building, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Patricia LeeAnn YoungbloodCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, J.B. George Building, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Lucy BradshawCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, J.B. George Building, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Charles G MarxCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Speech and Hearing Sciences, J.B. George Building, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA. Electronic address: charles.marx@usm.edu.
University of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compared distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) recorded from infants whose mother had Covid-19 during pregnancy (Covid-19 group) to infants whose mother did not have Covid-19 (Control group) during pregnancy.

methodsThis study retrospectively examined records of infants in the Covid-19 group (n = 15) and control group (n = 46) who had distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) recorded as part of their clinical assessment. DPOAE amplitudes, absolute latencies (I, III, and V), and I-V interpeak intervals were examined.

resultsDPOAE amplitudes were similar between the Covid-19 group and the control group. The absolute latency of wave I was similar between groups. But absolute latencies III and V and I-V interpeak intervals of the Covid-19 group were significantly prolonged compared to the control group.

conclusionCovid-19 infection and its complications during pregnancy may not affect the cochlear function but may affect the functioning of the auditory brainstem.

Indexed as

COVID-19Otoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAuditory ThresholdEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAuditory brainstem responsesCovid-19Distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Identifiers

PMID35533437
PMCPMC9066709
OpenAlexW4229366856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.