ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2022
The Launch of the iCoDE Standard Project.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- An international position statement on practical approaches for inpatient continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps and automated insulin delivery systems in adults.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Twenty-first century management of diabetes with shared telemedicine appointments.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2025Review
- Technology in the management of diabetes in hospitalised adults.Diabetologia · 2024Review
- A narrative commentary about interoperability in medical devices and data used in diabetes therapy from an academic EU/UK/US perspective.Diabetologia · 2024Review
- The Design of the Electronic Health Record in Type 1 Diabetes Centers: Implications for Metrics and Data Availability for a Quality Collaborative.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Improving Care for People Living With Dementia and Diabetes: Applying the Human-Centered Design Process to Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- NIH Fifth Artificial Pancreas Workshop 2023: Meeting Report: The Fifth Artificial Pancreas Workshop: Enabling Fully Automation, Access, and Adoption.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- The Need for Data Standards and Implementation Policies to Integrate Insulin Delivery Data Into the Electronic Health Record.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Diabetes Technology Meeting 2022.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Roadmap to Continuous Glucose Monitoring Adoption and Improved Outcomes in Endocrinology: The 4T (Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control) Program.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023Article
- Increasing Use of Diabetes Devices: What Do Health Care Professionals Need?Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023Article
- iCoDE June 22, 2022 Steering Committee Meeting Summary Report.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
- E-health as a sine qua non for modern healthcare.RMD open · 2022Article
- Hospital Diabetes Meeting 2022.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe first meeting of the Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitor Data into the Electronic Health Record (iCoDE) project, organized by Diabetes Technology Society, took place virtually on January 27, 2022.
methodsClinicians, government officials, data aggregators, attorneys, and standards experts spoke in panels and breakout groups. Three themes were covered: 1) why digital health data integration into the electronic health record (EHR) is needed, 2) what integrated continuously monitored glucose data will look like, and 3) how this process can be achieved in a way that will satisfy clinicians, healthcare organizations, and regulatory experts.
resultsThe meeting themes were addressed within eight sessions: 1) What Do Inpatient Clinicians Want to See With Integration of CGM Data into the EHR?, 2) What Do Outpatient Clinicians Want to See With Integration of CGM Data into the EHR?, 3) Why Are Data Standards and Guidances Useful?, 4) What Value Can Data Integration Services Add?, 5) What Are Examples of Successful Integration?, 6) Which Privacy, Security, and Regulatory Issues Must Be Addressed to Integrate CGM Data into the EHR?, 7) Breakout Group Discussions, and 8) Presentation of Breakout Group Ideas.
conclusionsCreation of data standards and workflow guidance are necessary components of the Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitor Data into the Electronic Health Record (iCoDE) standard project. This meeting, which launched iCoDE, will be followed by a set of working group meetings intended to create the needed standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.