ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2022
Nursing training and retraining on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a theoretical-practical intervention.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of flipped classroom-based simulation of CPR on nursing students' self-confidence, satisfaction, knowledge and skill: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Comparing Visual Self-Assessment and Virtual Reality Training for Improving Basic Life Support Competency in Nursing Students: An Educational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Quality of nursing records in cardiac arrest based on the In-hospital Utstein Style protocol.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Effects of deliberate practice at different training frequencies on long-term retention of high-quality chest compression proficiency among novice nurses: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of simulation-based stratified first aid training on physicians: a cohort study stratified by clinical working time and disciplinary background.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of AED training on nurses' emergency response capabilities in China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The Effect of "Online-Simulation-Bedside" Three-Step Teaching Method in Team Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Training of Emergency Department and Critical Care Nursing Interns-An Analysis Based on Kirkpatrick Model.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: An Interprofessional Approach With Undergraduate Medicine and Nursing Students Using Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES)-A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Nurses' professional competencies in urgency and emergency units: A mixed-methods study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of a video-based refresher on cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill retention in college students: A single-blind randomized controlled trial.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the retention of knowledge and skills of nursing professionals following training and retraining on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
methodThis is an intervention, prospective, and analytical study in which 56 nursing professionals received theoretical and practical training in in-service cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nine months after the first training (T1), these professionals participated in a retraining (T2). They were followed up for 18 months. The linear trend of knowledge and skills in the period following training was calculated and the Wilcoxon test was applied.
resultsInterventions increased the knowledge and skills of professionals significantly; however, in the subsequent period, skills decreased. Despite this, after a period of nine months, they were still higher than those identified before the study. There was a reduction of 18.2% in knowledge in the theoretical test after T1 vs 13.0% after T2 (p < 0.01) and a reduction of 7.6% in skills on the practical test after T1 vs 5.3% after T2 (p < 0.01).
conclusionNurses were able to retain more knowledge and skills on cardiopulmonary resuscitation after retraining, which stresses the importance of regular training and continuing education in health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.