ReviewInternational journal of hematology2022
Progress of modern imaging modalities in multiple myeloma.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of a multimodal MRI-based quantitative feature prediction model for the prognosis of non-metastatic primary osteosarcoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) for quantitative assessment of multiple myeloma.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- Guest Editorial: Innovation will be a bridge to cure in patients with multiple myeloma?International journal of hematology · 2022Article
- Recent developments on the application of molecular probes in multiple myeloma: Beyond [Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy, but treatment advances made in the last two decades have markedly improved its prognosis. Imaging has played a particularly important role in the management of myeloma. Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is replacing conventional skeletal survey by whole-body X-rays. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have become important imaging modalities not only for MM diagnosis but also for assessment of myeloma cell infiltration, extramedullary disease, treatment efficacy, and prognosis. However, there is room to improve their accuracy and specificity for assessment of treatment response, tumor volume, and residual disease. This review introduces novel diagnostic techniques, such as WBLDCT, MRI, and PET/CT, discusses their contribution to MM care, and lists areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.