Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35532751›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2022

Full Reperfusion Without Functional Independence After Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Anterior Circulation : Performance of Prediction Models Before Versus After Treatment Initiation.

Charlotte S Weyland, Johannes A Vey, Yahia Mokli, Manuel Feisst, Meinhard Kieser, Christian Herweh, Silvia Schönenberge, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Martin Bendszus, Peter A Ringleb and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Progressive microvascular failure in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and time-course analysis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte S WeylandDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes A VeyInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yahia MokliDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel FeisstInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Meinhard KieserInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian HerwehDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Silvia SchönenbergeDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A MöhlenbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter A RinglebDepartment of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon NagelInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. nagelsi@klilu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-6647
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePrediction of futile recanalization (FR), i.e. failure of long-term functional independence despite full reperfusion in mechanical thrombectomy (MT), is instrumental in patients undergoing endovascular therapy.

methodsRetrospective single-center analysis of patients treated for anterior circulation LVO ensuing successful MT (mTICI 2c-3) between January 2014 and April 2019. FR was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after stroke onset > 2 or mRS > pre-stroke mRS. Multivariable analysis was performed with variables available before treatment initiation regarding their association with FR. Performance of the regression model was then compared with a model including parameters available after MT.

resultsSuccessful MT was experienced by 549/1146 patients in total. FR occurred in 262/549 (47.7%) patients. Independent predictors of FR were male sex, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98 (1.31-3.05, p 0.001), age (OR 1.05, CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.001), NIHSS on admission (OR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.13, p < 0.001), pre-stroke mRS (OR 1.22, CI 1.03-1.46, p 0.025), neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.03, CI 1.00-1.06, p 0.022), baseline ASPECTS (OR 0.77, CI 0.68-0.88, p < 0.001), and absence of bridging i.v. lysis (OR 1.62, 1.09-2.42, p 0.016). The prediction model's Area Under the Curve was 0.78 (CI 0.74-0.82) and increased with parameters available after MT to 0.86 (CI 0.83-0.89) with failure of early neurological improvement being the most important predictor of FR (OR 15.0, CI 7.2-33.8).

conclusionA variety of preinterventional factors may predict FR with substantial certainty, but the prediction model can still be improved by considering parameters only available after MT, in particular early neurological improvement.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeEarly neurological improvementFutile recanalizationIschemic strokeLogistic regression modelsOutcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID35532751
PMCPMC9744692
OpenAlexW4229442716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.