Observational studyThe Indian journal of medical research2021
Clinico-microbiological profile of
Observational study in The Indian journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbapenem resistance in enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis isolated from colonoscopy candidates.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Phenotypic and genotypic identification of carbapenem resistance in Bacteroides fragilis clinical strains.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objective: Bacteroides fragilis is a Gram-negative anaerobic opportunistic pathogen which is managed by empirical anaerobic coverage as a hospital norm. However, with rising reports of resistance among B. fragilis strains, antibiotic susceptibility testing for this pathogen may be the only way to understand the magnitude of the problem. This study aimed to characterize resistance patterns among clinical isolates and identify resistance genes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted which included all samples requesting anaerobic cultures within the study period. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was detected for metronidazole, clindamycin and chloramphenicol by agar dilution. E-test strips were used for imipenem and piperacillin, followed by polymerase chain reaction to detect nim and cfiA genes. Results: Among a total of 50 isolates, 94 per cent (47/50) were susceptible and six per cent (3/50) showed intermediate resistance to metronidazole. Susceptibility to clindamycin and piperacillin was noted in 70 and 50 per cent of strains; intermediate resistance in 14 and 2 per cent and resistance in 16 and 48 per cent, respectively. No resistance was observed for chloramphenicol and imipenem. Nim gene was found in 26 per cent (13/50) and cfiA gene was found in 52 per cent (26/50) of isolates. Isolates with high metronidazole MIC of 8-16 μg/ml were found to carry nim gene (χ Interpretation & conclusions: Rising resistance among B. fragilis is evident and there is a significant association between nim gene and metronidazole resistance. Improving awareness among clinicians is paramount in tackling AMR among these pathogens, as empirical anaerobic coverage may not be effective in all cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.