Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35532232›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Black Soldier Fly Larvae Influence Internal and Substrate Bacterial Community Composition Depending on Substrate Type and Larval Density.

Stijn J J Schreven, Hugo de Vries, Gerben D A Hermes, Giacomo Zeni, Hauke Smidt, Marcel Dicke, Joop J A van Loon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Investigating the Microbial Dynamics ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Early Growth Patterns ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stijn J J SchrevenLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-7025
Hugo de VriesLaboratory of Microbiology, Agrotechnology & Food Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Gerben D A HermesLaboratory of Microbiology, Agrotechnology & Food Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Giacomo ZeniLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Agrotechnology & Food Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saprophagous fly larvae interact with a rich community of bacteria in decomposing organic matter. Larvae of some species, such as the black soldier fly, can process a wide range of organic residual streams into edible insect biomass and thus produce protein as a sustainable component of livestock feed. The microbiological safety of the insects and substrates remains a point of concern. Substrate-associated bacteria can dominate the larval gut microbiota, but the larvae can also alter the bacterial community in the substrate. However, the relative importance of substrate type and larval density in bacterial community dynamics is unknown. We investigated four larval densities (0 [control], 50, 100, or 200 larvae per container [520 mL; diameter, 75 mm]) and three feed substrates (chicken feed, chicken manure, and camelina substrate [50% chicken feed, 50% camelina oilseed press cake]) and sampled the bacterial communities of the substrates and larvae at three time points over 15 days. Although feed substrate was the strongest driver of microbiota composition over time, larval density significantly altered the relative abundances of several common bacterial genera, including potential pathogens, in each substrate and in larvae fed chicken feed. Bacterial communities of the larvae and substrate differed to a higher degree in chicken manure and camelina than in chicken feed. This supports the substrate-dependent impact of black soldier fly larvae on bacteria both within the larvae and in the substrate. This study indicates that substrate composition and larval density can alter bacterial community composition and might be used to improve insect microbiological safety.

Indexed as

DipteraManureAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaChickensLarvaManure16S rRNA geneamplicon sequencingCamelina sativaHermetia illucenslarval densitymanuremicrobiotapH

Identifiers

PMID35532232
PMCPMC9128521
OpenAlexW4229370354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.