Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35532039›Full record

ArticleJournal of mental health (Abingdon, England)2025

Interventions that support unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients: a scoping review.

Ruth Naughton-Doe, Nicola Moran, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Laura Bennett, Martin Webber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health effects of caregiving and coping with severe mental disorders: A caregivers' experience.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Naughton-DoeInternational Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, England.ORCID 0000-0003-2683-3476
Nicola MoranInternational Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, England.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-0394
Emma WakemanSt Andrew's Healthcare, Northampton, UK.
Mark WilberforceSocial Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6977-4483
Laura BennettCarers Trust, London, UK.
Martin WebberInternational Centre for Mental Health Social Research, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, England.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-1376
Centre for Mental Health · GBCarers Trust · GBSt Andrew's Healthcare · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients often lack support for their well-being and feel excluded from decisions about patient care.

aimsThis scoping review aimed to: synthesise the peer-reviewed literature evaluating the outcomes of brief interventions for unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients, identify transferable lessons for evidenced-informed practice, and establish future research priorities.

methodsPRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed to search 12 databases using predefined search terms. Two reviewers independently screened papers and applied exclusion/inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact or outcomes of interventions. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were synthesised to categorise types of interventions and evidence for their outcomes.

results16 papers met the inclusion criteria, and five types of interventions were identified: those that aimed to (1) increase carer involvement in inpatient care; (2) facilitate organisational change to increase carer support and involvement; (3) provide carers with support; (4) deliver psychoeducation and offer support; and (5) reduce carer stress and improve coping skills.

conclusionsWhilst evidence of intervention effectiveness was promising, the quality of studies was generally weak. More research is needed to develop an evidence-informed approach to supporting carers during inpatient stays.

Indexed as

CaregiversInpatientsMental DisordersSocial SupportAdultHumansfamily carershospitalinpatientinvolvementMental healthsupportunpaid carers

Identifiers

PMID35532039
PMCPMC11835312
OpenAlexW4229439688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.