Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531947›Full record

ArticleOmega2024

Mortality Awareness: New Directions.

Margot Kuylen, Shihui Han, Lasana Harris, Quentin Huys, Susana Monsó, Alexandra Pitman, Stephen M Fleming, Anthony S David

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margot KuylenMental Health, Ethics and Law Research Group, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Shihui HanCulture and Social Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lasana HarrisDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Quentin HuysDivision of Psychiatry and Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK.
Susana MonsóDepartment of Logic, History, and Philosophy of Science, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Alexandra PitmanUCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Stephen M FlemingDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Anthony S DavidUCL Institute of Mental Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0967-774X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L501487/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thinking about our own death and its salience in relation to decision making has become a fruitful area of multidisciplinary research across the breadth of psychological science. By bringing together experts from philosophy, cognitive and affective neuroscience, clinical and computational psychiatry we have attempted to set out the current state of the art and point to areas of further enquiry. One stimulus for doing this is the need to engage with policy makers who are now having to consider guidelines on suicide and assisted suicide so that they may be aware of their own as well as the wider populations' cognitive processes when confronted with the ultimate truth of mortality.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathAwarenessDecision MakingHumansSuicideSuicide, Assistedcognitive neurosciencedeath anxietyfunctional magnetic resonance imagingsuicideterror management theory

Identifiers

PMID35531947
PMCPMC11437703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.