Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531781›Full record

ArticleStroke2022

Preparing for a Second Attack: A Lesion Simulation Study on Network Resilience After Stroke.

Mitsouko van Assche, Julian Klug, Elisabeth Dirren, Jonas Richiardi, Emmanuel Carrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mitsouko van Assche *Stroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (M.v.A., J.K., E.D., E.C.).
Julian Klug *Stroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (M.v.A., J.K., E.D., E.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-4849-9811
Elisabeth DirrenStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (M.v.A., J.K., E.D., E.C.).
Jonas Richiardi *Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland (J.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-6975-5634
Emmanuel Carrera *Stroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland (M.v.A., J.K., E.D., E.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-0045-5382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoes the brain become more resilient after a first stroke to reduce the consequences of a new lesion? Although recurrent strokes are a major clinical issue, whether and how the brain prepares for a second attack is unknown. This is due to the difficulties to obtain an appropriate dataset of stroke patients with comparable lesions, imaged at the same interval after onset. Furthermore, timing of the recurrent event remains unpredictable.

methodsHere, we used a novel clinical lesion simulation approach to test the hypothesis that resilience in brain networks increases during stroke recovery. Sixteen highly selected patients with a lesion restricted to the primary motor cortex were recruited. At 3 time points of the index event (10 days, 3 weeks, 3 months), we mimicked recurrent infarcts by deletion of nodes in brain networks (resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging). Graph measures were applied to determine resilience (global efficiency after attack) and wiring cost (mean degree) of the network.

resultsAt 10 days and 3 weeks after stroke, resilience was similar in patients and controls. However, at 3 months, although motor function had fully recovered, resilience to clinically representative simulated lesions was higher compared to controls (cortical lesion

conclusionsOur results suggest that, in this highly selected cohort of patients with lesions restricted to the primary motor cortex, brain networks reconfigure to increase resilience to future insults. Lesion simulation is an innovative approach, which may have major implications for stroke therapy. Individualized neuromodulation strategies could be developed to foster resilient network reconfigurations after a first stroke to limit the consequences of future attacks.

Indexed as

StrokeBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingconnectivitygraphmagnetic resonance imagingmotor cortexrecoveryresiliencestroke

Identifiers

PMID35531781
PMCPMC10292575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.